 |
|
|
|
|
 |
Sponsored Topics... |
|
|
 |
More Resources... |
|
|
Public Lift Putters
http://mittromneyapps.com/ "PAGE ONE of 264 MILLION WEBSITES" SEO Expert
Stan Krol Says sell for $35,995. 24 hr/7 days/365 yearly income!!!!
.
Like·, Share ,·Forward this
Lift Putters LLC Assets..
Google key words > Mitt Romney App < See 194M Results!
2 minutes ago · facebook Like , share and forward this
Write a comment..... 2012 Jobs for YOU!! Self Deportation org net info includes development of new website to "YOUR" standards.
http://www.Self-Deportation.org ***Domain for Sale $65,950. Stan Krol CIO Owner,
Mitt Romney Campaign Owns the Dot Com Domain.
|
|
Most recent mitt romney apps blog posts... |
| |
|
|
| |
Mitt Romney FAQ FYI facts
January 07, 2012 @ 4:51:01 PM EST |
|
| |
Crime and punishment
Romney supports sentencing under the three strikes law.[27][28][29] Romney supports mandatory increases in sentencing for repeat drunk drivers and has supported a federal effort to curtail the drug trade in Colombia.[19]
As Governor of Massachusetts, Romney announced plans to file a death penalty bill in early 2005. The bill, filed April 28, 2005, sought to reinstate the death penalty in cases that include terrorism, the assassination of law enforcement officials and multiple killings. Romney's legislation required the presence of scientific evidence such as DNA to sentence someone to death and a tougher standard of "no doubt" of guilt for juries to sentence defendants. This differs from the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard used in traditional criminal cases. The legislation called for a pool of certified capital case lawyers to ensure proper representation for the accused and allowed jurors who do not personally support the death penalty to serve in the guilt phase of the trial.[30] The bill was defeated in the Massachusetts House of Representatives by a vote of 100-53.[31]
[edit] Child protection
As president, Governor Romney said he would propose a "One-Strike, You're Ours" law for child sex offenders convicted of using the Internet to prey on children. This would cause newer, tougher federal penalties for first-time sexual offenders who used the Internet to assault children, which would include considerable mandatory jail time and lifetime tracking by GPS. It would impose the same sentence that states such as Florida and California have put in place with "Jessica's Law." Governor Romney would also require stricter enforcement of federal obscenity laws, which he says "have not been adequately enforced." He has also said he would punish and fine retailers for selling sexually explicit and excessively violent video games to minors.[32]
During his 2007 Iowa Republican Straw Poll speech, Romney stated "I want to make sure that every computer that goes into a home in the future [has the ability] for the citizen[s], the parent[s], to be able to block all that pornography from their kid's internet screen."[33]
[edit] Civil rights
Romney cites both Martin Luther King, Jr. and his father George Romney as role models. The senior Romney made headlines by walking out on 1964 Republican National Convention nominee Barry Goldwater because of his opposition to federal civil rights legislation, despite opposition from some in the party.[34]
Governor Romney supports the Employment Nondiscrimination Act at state level.[citation needed] Romney has expressed support for decreasing barriers to entry into the workforce for women and minorities.[35] He has expressed support for Muslims who face discrimination due to their religion.[19]
[edit] Education
Romney supports increasing standards for education and quality based incentives for teachers. He proposes identifying failing schools, more efficient schools and accountability, school choice, and English immersion. Romney has supported private and government efforts to increase merit scholarships for high school students. He has supported reforming under-performing schools with charter schools. Romney has supported means-tested vouchers for public and private schools as Governor. He has opposed efforts to teach creationism in schools. He believes that there should be more of an emphasis on family values in the educational system. Romney has supported efforts to fund nanotechnology and materials science education.[19]
Romney currently supports the federal government's involvement in education and supports No Child Left Behind. He said that he supports testing in schools and that testing "allows us to get better schools."[17] Romney also approved efforts in Massachusetts to require parents in poorly performing schools to attend parental education classes and awarding four-year scholarships to the best students. He also said he "favors paying bonuses to teachers who successfully teach ."[36] In his 1994 run for the Senate, Romney supported abolishing the Department of Education but has since renounced that. In the second presidential debate in South Carolina, he said,
I've taken a position where, once upon a time, I said I wanted to eliminate the Department of Education. That was my position when I ran for Senate in 1994. That's very popular with the base. As I've been a governor and seen the impact that the federal government can have holding down the interest of the teachers' unions and instead putting the interests of the kids and the parents and the teachers first, I see that the Department of Education can actually make a difference.[17]
In 1994, Romney, as a candidate for U.S. Senate, pledged to vote to establish a means-tested school voucher program to allow students to attend the public or private school of their choice.[37]
Romney has stated that superintendents and principals should be able to fire teachers without regard for seniority.[38] He also has stated that he is in favor of standardized testing as a high school graduation requirement and alternative education options for parents and students. He has declared his support for charter schools, school vouchers and home schooling.[39] Romney has said that good education is needed to compete in the global economy.[40]
Romney has said that sex education has no place in kindergarten.[41] According to Romney, "the amount of sex education which is appropriate in kindergarten is absolutely zero."[42]
Romney has dismissed the drive for class-size reduction as a ploy by the teachers unions.[43]
[edit] Education and economic growth
Romney believes that a proper role for government in encouraging economic growth is ensuring that students receive the best education possible. After fostering a highly-educated workforce and lowering taxes, he asserts that the "best thing the country can do is unleash the power of entrepreneurs and get out of the way."[44]
[edit] Abstinence education
Romney has declared his support for abstinence education in public schools. In his run for the Senate in 1994, he said one of the programs that should be taught in schools was "the importance of getting married before having children."[45]
In the May 2007 South Carolina debate, Romney said he has always "fought for abstinence education."[17]
Prayer in schools
In 1994, Romney said that he has been consistently against public schools endorsing one religion or faith that may alienate other students. He said that "local school districts should have complete control over the programs, but that they could not endorse specific religious beliefs or prayer in schools"[45]
In 2006, he said, "We ought to allow ceremonies, graduation ceremonies and public events that we have the ability to recognize the Creator."[46]
[edit] "Fairness Doctrine"
Romney was against reviving the Fairness Doctrine, which regulates broadcasters to present controversial topics in what the Federal Communications Commission deemed a balanced, fair manner. Romney said, "I'd veto it if it ever got to my desk. And I would fight against it vehemently. The effort to try to impose the Fairness Doctrine on radio stations is, if you will, censorship Democrat style. It basically says we're not going to let you keep talking about the things you want to talk about and the market wants to hear."[47]
[edit] Family
Mitt Romney has said that strong families are one of his three pillars, along with military and economy, for a strong America.[48]
Romney's 2008 campaign website featured his quote, "America cannot continue to lead the family of nations around the world if we suffer the collapse of the family here at home."[49]
[edit] Gambling
In October 2011, Romney told the Las Vegas Sun that he had not yet taken a serious look at the issue of legalizing online poker, but that he would do so and state a position "[b]efore the caucuses come along".[50]
[edit] Gun control
Romney has said "I support the right of individuals to keep and bear arms as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution,"[51] though in past campaigns he has described himself as a proponent of gun control, and he fully supports a ban on assault weapons.[52]
For Romney's 1994 US Senate campaign, he supported the Brady Bill, which imposed a five-day waiting period on gun sales, and a ban on particular semi-automatic rifles.[52] In a 2002 debate during Romney's campaign for governor of Massachusetts, Romney said: "We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them. I won't chip away at them; I believe they protect us and provide for our safety."[53] As governor, Romney signed a 2004 measure instituting a permanent Massachusetts ban on military style assault weapons, to take the place of a Federal ban, which was then about to expire. The bill made Massachusetts the first state to enact its own such ban on specific semi-automatic weapons and some shotguns with specific accessories, and Romney supported the law with the comment: "These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."[54] As Governor, Romney extended the term of firearm licenses from four to six years, reinstated a 90-day grace period for citizens renewing their gun licenses, and signed a law providing free replacement licenses.[citation needed]
When he supported the Brady Bill in 1994, Romney said, "That's not going to make me the hero of the NRA. I don't line up with the NRA."[53] Just before declaring his candidacy for the 2008 Republican nomination for president, Romney joined the National Rifle Association (NRA).[52][52][55] In 2005, Romney declared the 31st anniversary of the Gun Owners' Action League "Right to Bear Arms Day".[56]
Romney made several statements in his 2008 campaign regarding his proficiency with and support for firearms:
"I've hunted a number of times, of various types of small rodents."[57][citation needed]
"Shooting rabbits single shot 22 is pretty hard."[58]
"I have a gun of my own. I go hunting myself. I'm a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms. In our state . . . there are a series of laws restricting gun ownership in various ways. Over the past four years, I've worked very closely with the Gun Owners' Action League here, which is an affiliate of the NRA, and we've made some changes which I think they feel have been positive steps. And so you are going to see that, I think, hopefully, in other states as well, as they make progress, perhaps further than Massachusetts has."[53]
"So I'm a hunter and believe in Second Amendment rights, but I also believe that assault weapons are not needed in the public population."[59]
Romney later clarified that he did not 'own' a gun and said that one of his sons keeps two guns at the family vacation home in Utah.[55]
The Associated Press reported in April 2007 that Romney never sought a hunting license in any of the four states where he has resided. Romney replied by saying that he mainly hunts small game in Utah, which does not require a license.[60]
[edit] LGBT issues
Romney has stated his opposition to both same-sex marriage and civil unions, though he supports some domestic partnership benefits and (at the state level) supports anti-discrimination laws to protect gays and lesbians in the workplace.
Prior to Romney's 2008 presidential campaign, he had a varied history regarding legal rights and responsibilities accorded to same-sex couples. During his 1994 senate campaign and 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial campaign, Romney said he would have a better policy providing for domestic partnerships than his Democratic opponents.[61] In 1994, Romney sent a letter to the Log Cabin Republicans saying that he would be a stronger advocate for gay rights in the Senate than his opponent at the time, Senator Edward M. Kennedy. His letter included the phrase "We must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern."[62] In 2002, Romney spoke regarding domestic partnership benefits, saying, "All citizens deserve equal rights, regardless of their sexual orientation." Romney said that domestic partnership status should be recognized in a way that includes the potential for health benefits and rights of survivorship.[63][64]
As a candidate for governor in 2002, Romney said: "Call me old fashioned, but I don't support gay marriage nor do I support civil union." During that 2002 campaign, he also supported hate crimes legislation and opposed other discrimination against gays, while supporting some partner benefits for gays.[citation needed]
Also in 2002, Romney opposed a Massachusetts constitutional amendment that would have banned same-sex marriage and domestic partnerships because the amendment, which was supported by the Democratic leader Tom Finneran, would have prohibited domestic partnership benefits for gays and lesbians.[65]
Romney said,
"Basically I see the provision of basic civil rights and domestic partnership benefits [as] a campaign against Tom Finneran. I see Tom Finneran and the Democratic leadership as having opposed the application of domestic partnership benefits to gay and lesbian couples and I will support and endorse efforts to provide those domestic partnership benefits to gay and lesbian couples."[65]
In 2006, Romney announced his support of the Federal Marriage Amendment, which would have federally defined marriage in the U.S. Constitution as the union of one man and one woman.[66][67]
Romney said during his 2008 presidential campaign,
[M]y view on marriage has been entirely consistent over my political career. And that is that I oppose same-sex marriage. I also oppose civil unions . . . ever since [same-sex marriage] became a prominent [feature] in my state, with the decision of the Supreme Judicial Court, I have taken every action that I could conceive of within the bounds of the law to defend traditional marriage and to stop same-sex marriage . . . I've been to Washington to testify in favor of traditional marriage. I've written a letter to every U.S. senator on the topic . . . I believe that traditional marriage is right for the nurturing and development of children, but that I do not want to discriminate against gay people in employment or housing or other parts of their life.[68]
In July 2011, Romney refused to sign a pledge opposing gay marriage, a pledge that was being circulated by "The Family Leader", a conservative Christian group in Iowa.[69] On August 4, 2011, a month later, Romney publicly denounced same-sex marriage by signing the 2012 Presidential Pledge sponsored by the National Organization for Marriage.[70]
[edit] "Don't ask, don't tell"
Romney supported Bill Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in 1994, and continued to do so in 2007.[71][72] Romney has said that he thinks that the Don't ask, don't tell policy is working and he would not change it, especially in the middle of a war, and that "we have much bigger issues as a nation that we ought to be talking about than that policy right now."[73]
[edit] Medical marijuana
Romney is a strong opponent of illegal drugs and does not favor legalizing medical cannabis. Romney answered a question on the subject from a man afflicted with muscular dystrophy who asked him about it on October 7, 2007.[74]
[edit] Pornography
Romney has criticized what he calls the "cesspool" of pornography; however, in July 2007, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, the president of the American Family Foundation, and Daniel Weiss, media analyst for James Dobson's Focus on the Family said Romney had not prevented Marriott Hotels from making pornography available in its hotel rooms when he served on the hotel chain's board from 1992 to 2001. In an Associated Press interview, Romney said he was unaware of how much revenue the hotels generated from pornography, although he had served on the board's financial audit committee.[75]
Romney ran ads in key early primary states of New Hampshire, Iowa and South Carolina saying that children should not be exposed to destructive influences.[citation needed] Romney said, "I am not pursuing an effort to try and stop adults from being able to acquire or see things that I find objectionable; that's their right. But I do vehemently oppose practices or business procedures that will allow kids to be exposed to obscenity."[76]
[edit] Stem cell research
Romney has said that research using human embryos created during fertility treatments is ethical but opposes using federal funds to support it.[77] He opposes research using cloned embryos created by implanting human DNA into donated eggs.[77] When he ran for governor in 2002, Romney strongly advocated stem-cell research in general terms, and he promised to lobby George W. Bush to embrace such research.[77] During his presidential campaign, 2008, however, Romney renounced his 2002 position and said that he now agrees with Bush's decision to ban federal funding for research on excess embryos.[77]
[edit] Economic policy
In January 2008, a comprehensive analysis by the National Taxpayers Union found that Romney's presidential campaign proposals would increase the federal budget by $19.5 billion.[78]
[edit] Jobs plan
Mitt Romney published a far-reaching economic plan.[79]
[edit] Stimulus
In January 2009, Romney said:
I think there is need for economic stimulus. Americans have lost about $11 trillion in net worth. That translates into about $400 billion a year less spending that they'll be doing, and that's net of additional government programs like Medicaid and unemployment insurance. And government can help make that up in a very difficult time. And that's one of the reasons why I think a stimulus program is needed.[80]
Romney said, however, that he did not support the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
[edit] Barack Obama's record on economics
In 2011, Romney said that
Barack Obama has failed America. When he took office, the economy was in recession. He made it worse. And he made it last longer. Three years later, over 16 million Americans are out of work or have just quit looking. Millions more are underemployed. Three years later, unemployment is still above 8%, a figure he said his stimulus would keep from happening. Three years later, foreclosures are still at record levels. Three years later the prices of homes continue to fall. Three years later, our national debt has grown nearly as large as our entire economy. Families are buried under higher prices for food and higher prices for gasoline. It breaks my heart to see what's happening in this country. These failing hopes make up President Obama's own misery index. It's never been higher!
|
|
|
| |
51 Comments so far - |
|
| |
We will win said... January 13, 2012 @ 10:55:09 PM EST
|
|
| |
Anti-Bain hits on Romney may take root in SC race
By Charles Babington
Associated Press
Posted: 01/13/2012 06:43:26 PM PST
BLUFFTON, S.C. -- South Carolina may be fertile ground for attacks on Mitt Romney's corporate takeover record.
The state has suffered a long string of shuttered textile plants and other workplaces. At 9.9 percent, it has one of the nation's highest unemployment rates. And like its fellow Deep South states, its Republican electorate has a disproportionate number of blue-collar workers.
That combination could make South Carolina a good test of efforts by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Texas Gov. Rick Perry to paint the GOP presidential front-runner as a heartless venture capitalist who fired workers while reaping big profits during his time at Bain Capital in the 1980s and 1990s. Those attacks may be starting to resonate.
"I don't like it," said Rhonda Jones, 50, a Republican who showed up Friday to see Perry at the Squat 'n' Gobble cafe. The stay-at-home mom talked about how Romney's record at Bain "is what concerns me" and said she will vote for either Perry or Gingrich. Romney is a nonstarter.
"He was money-hungry himself," Jones said, adding that she knows several unemployed people. "He wasn't looking out for people."
South Carolina's Jan. 21 primary may mark the last real chance for his rivals to stop Romney's drive to the nomination.
President Barack Obama's aides have made it clear they will hammer Romney on Bain if he becomes the nominee. Obama won't try to win GOP-heavy South Carolina in November. But
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Advertisement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
independent voters' reaction to the Bain-related attacks may give his campaign some hints of the issue's potency nationwide.
An array of conservative leaders and party officials are denouncing Gingrich and Perry for the Bain attacks, saying they sound like Democrats attacking free enterprise. Stung, the two candidates softened their criticisms in campaign stops throughout South Carolina this week.
But they didn't drop them altogether. And a well-financed group backing Gingrich is airing a foreboding TV ad here that shows displaced workers blaming Romney and Bain Capital for their job losses.
If enough GOP voters like Jones see it, Romney may face rougher sledding than he did in Iowa and New Hampshire, says Merle Black of Emory University, who has written extensively on Southern politics.
"This is really going to be a challenge for him," Black said. When low-income and low-education Republicans hear the criticisms of Bain's record, he said, "it might repel them from Romney."
|
|
| |
latest polls said... January 15, 2012 @ 11:17:50 AM EST
|
|
| |
Poll: Mitt Romney leads Ron Paul by 20 points in South Carolina
The State Column | Staff | Saturday, January 14, 2012
Share
25
Share
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney is the clear front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, according to the latest poll released by Reuters/Ipsos.
The Massachusetts Republican leads his Republican counterparts by one of the largest margins recorded since the campaign for the South Carolina primary began. The latest poll show Mr. Romney leading Rep. Ron Paul, congressman from Texas, by more than 20 points.
The poll showed 37 percent of South Carolina Republican voters back Mr. Romney. Mr. Paul and former Senator Rick Santorum tied for second place with 16 percent support. Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House of Representatives, seems to have fallen out of favor with Republican voters in the Palmetto State. The latest poll shows Mr. Gingrich in fourth place with just 12 percent of the vote.
After Mr. Gingrich, Texas Republican Governor Rick Perry placed next, receiving just 6 percent support. Former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, who was third in the New Hampshire primary, received just 3 percent support.
“In primary races things can change quickly but it does look like Romney is in position to win South Carolina, and if he wins … that’s sort of the end of the road for most of his challengers,” Ipsos pollster Chris Jackson said.
For President Obama the poll is the latest sign that he is likely to face a tough bid for re-election. In a question asked of Republicans and Democrats, the poll found South Carolina voters would favor Mr. Romney over Mr. Obama by 46 percent to 40 percent.
The poll comes as Mr. Romney is widely seen as the Republican front-runner. The Massachusetts Republican has already secured victories in the state of New Hampshire and in the state of Iowa. Polls released over the week show Mr. Romney well ahead of his Republican rivals, including Mr. Paul, who remains the only Republican to have a serious chance of challenging Mr. Romney.
Read more: http://www.thestatecolumn.com/articles/poll-mitt-romney-leads-ron-paul-by-20-points-in-south-carolina/#ixzz1jXmrJSnC |
|
| |
Dems failed Policies said... January 15, 2012 @ 2:49:59 PM EST
|
|
| |
2012 Political Writers for GOP Campaigns (Malibu , CA 90265)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2012-01-15, 11:42AM PST
Reply to: see below
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Top 5 Failed Obama Policies
Obama Promised Big Things, But The Promises He Acutally Followed Through On Have Hurt More Than They've Helped
By Stanley(Stan)Krol for Mitt Romney App/Apps free downloads @ www.Mittapps.com or www.MittRomneyApps.com 424-781-5435/Local
THE STIMULUS
Obama's Stimulus Failed To Keep Unemployment Below 8 Percent As Obama Promised
Obama's $825 Billion Stimulus Failed To Keep The Unemployment Rate Below The 8 Percent And Is Nowhere Close To The 6 Percent They Predicted It Would Be At By Now. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12; Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, "The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,"1/9/09; Congressional Budget Office, 5/25/11)
Instead, Since The Stimulus Was Passed, The Unemployment Rate Has Increased From 8.2 Percent To 8.5 Percent And Has Remained Above 8 Percent For A Post-WWII Record 35 Straight Months. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
The Unemployment Rate Peaked At 10.1 Percent In October 2009. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
Obama's Stimulus Failed To Create The Over 3.5 Million Jobs That His Advisors Predicted It Would Create
PROMISE: Obama's Advisors Predicted That The Stimulus Would Create Over 3.5 Million Jobs And Raise Payroll Employment To Over 137.5 Million By The Fourth Quarter Of 2010. (Christina Romer and Jared Bernstein, "The Job Impact Of The American Recovery And Reinvestment Plan,"1/9/09)
FAILURE: Since President Obama's $825 Billion Stimulus Passed, The Nation Has Lost 1.1 Million Jobs. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
At The End Of 2010, Payroll Employment Was Only 130.3 Million. (Bureau Of Labor Statistics, Accessed 1/6/12)
The Washington Post's Fact Checker: "Obama Is On Track To Have The Worst Jobs Record Of Any President In The Modern Era." "Unless the economy turns around in the next 18 months, Obama is on track to have the worst jobs record of any president in the modern era. That would be an accurate statement." (Glenn Kessler, "Rick Perry's Claim That Obama Has 'Killed More Jobs' Than Any Other President," The Washington Post's "The Fact Checker", 8/22/11)
OBAMACARE
On CBS' "60 Minutes", Obama Called His Health Care Package One Of His Major Accomplishments
CBS' Steve Kroft: "Why do you think you deserve to be reelected? What have you accomplished?"
President Obama: "Not only saving this country from a great depression, not only saving the auto industry, but putting in place a system in which we're going to start lowering health care costs and you're never going to go bankrupt because you get sick or somebody in your family gets sick." (CBS' "60 Minutes," 12/11/11)
Yet ObamaCare Has Failed To Make Health Insurance More Affordable
PROMISE: Obama Promised His Plan "Would Save The Average Family $2,500 On Their Premiums." (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks Of Senator Barack Obama's Plan To Fight For Working Families And Take On Special Interests In Washington, Indianapolis, IN, 6/20/08)
FAILURE: FactCheck.org: ObamaCare Is Actually Making Health Care "Less Affordable." "At the moment, the new law is making health care slightly less affordable. Independent health care experts say the law has caused some insurance premiums to rise. As we wrote in October, the new law has caused about a 1 percent to 3 percent increase in health insurance premiums for employer-sponsored family plans because of requirements for increased benefits. Last year's premium increases cast even more doubt on another promise the president has made -- that the health care law would 'lower premiums by up to $2,500 for a typical family per year.'" (D'Angelo Gore, "Promises, Promises," Fact Check.org, 1/4/12)
The Washington Post's The Fact Checker: "Moreover, at this point it is debatable whether the law has made health care more affordable. Insurance premiums have gone up, in part because of new benefits mandated by the law." (Glenn Kessler, "The Fine Print In Obama's 'Promises Kept' Ad," The Washington Post's The Fact Checker, 1/6/12)
"The Cost Of Health Insurance Skyrocketed In 2011 After Several Years Of Relatively Small Increases." (Jane M. Von Bergen, "Health Insurance Costs Skyrocketing," The Philadelphia Inquirer, 9/27/11)
Workers Paid An Average Of $132 More For Family Coverage This Year. "Although premiums rose, employers kept the percentage of the premium workers pay about the same: An average of 18 percent for single coverage and 28 percent for family plans. Still, with rising costs, workers paid more, up an average of $132 a year for family coverage. Since 1999, the dollar amount workers contribute toward premiums nationally has grown 168 percent, while their wages have grown by 50 percent, according to the survey." (Julie Appleby, "Cost Of Employer Insurance Plans Surge In 2011," Kaiser Health News, 9/27/11)
Cost Of Single Employee Coverage Grew 8 Percent According To The Survey. "Family plan premiums hit $15,073 on average, while coverage for single employees grew 8 percent to $5,429, according to a survey released Tuesday by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust. (KHN is an editorially-independent program of the foundation.)" (Julie Appleby, "Cost Of Employer Insurance Plans Surge In 2011," Kaiser Health News, 9/27/11)
And Americans Are Losing Their Coverage
PROMISE: President Obama Promised That "If You Like Your Health Care Plan, You Will Be Able To Keep Your Health Care Plan. Period." OBAMA: "So let me begin by saying this: I know that there are millions of Americans who are content with their health care coverage - they like their plan and they value their relationship with their doctor. And that means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what. My view is that health care reform should be guided by a simple principle: fix what's broken and build on what works." (President Barack Obama, Address To The American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 6/15/09)
FAILURE: FactCheck.org: ObamaCare "Falls Short Of Making Health Care 'Affordable And Available To Every Single American,' As Promised." "Furthermore, the law falls short of making health care 'affordable and available to every single American,' as promised. The law provides subsidies to help some Americans buy insurance, expands Medicaid and doesn't allow insurance companies to exclude persons with preexisting conditions. But still, the director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected 23 million persons will remain uninsured -- some because they can't afford coverage." (D'Angelo Gore, "Promises, Promises," Fact Check.org, 1/4/12)
FactCheck.org: The White House Ad Promising Medicare "Benefits Will Remain The Same" Is False. "Currently, about 1 in every 4 Medicare beneficiary is enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. For many of them, the words in this ad ring hollow, and the promise that 'benefits will remain the same' is just as fictional as the town of Mayberry was when Griffith played the local sheriff." (Brooks Jackson, "Mayberry Misleads On Medicare," FactCheck.org, 7/31/10)
The Washington Post's The Fact Checker: "Not Every Single American" Has Health Coverage As Obama Promised. "No matter what one thinks of Obama's health care law, it was certainly a signature legislative achievement--the most sweeping health care law since the creation of Medicare. But notice that Obama said he would bring health care to 'every single American,' but the headline simply says 'more than 30 million Americans.' That translates into 95 percent of nonelderly Americans--when the law is fully implemented in 2016. That is certainly an increase over the 82-percent level that would have been expected in the absence of the law, but it is not 'every single American.'" (Glenn Kessler, "The Fine Print In Obama's 'Promises Kept' Ad," The Washington Post's The Fact Checker, 1/6/12)
A Survey Found That Only 60 Percent Of Employers Offered Medical Coverage This Year, A 9 Percent Decrease From 2010. "Sixty percent of employers said they offered medical benefits this year, a decrease from 69 percent in 2010." (Jeffrey Young, "Health-Benefit Costs Rise Most In Six Years," Bloomberg, 9/27/11)
GREEN JOBS
"The Obama Administration Has Managed The Nearly Impossible Feat Of Turning Energy Policy Into A Money Loser, Pouring Taxpayer Dollars Into Green-Energy Busts Like Solyndra."(Editorial, "The Non-Green Job Boom," The Wall Street Journal, 11/28/11)
Obama Predicted His Investments In Green Energy Would Create 5 Million Jobs
PROMISE: In 2008, Then-Senator Obama Claimed His Investments In Green Energy Would Create 5 Million New Jobs. OBAMA: "And I'll invest $150 billion over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy -- wind power, and solar power, and the next generation of biofuels -- an investment that will lead to new industries and 5 million new jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced."(Sen. Barack Obama, Acceptance Speech Remarks At The Democratic National Convention, Denver, CO, 8/28/08)
FAILURE: The Failure Of Obama's Green Jobs Programs "Gets More Embarrassing By The Day." "The green jobs subsidy story gets more embarrassing by the day. Three years ago President Obama promised that by the end of the decade America would have five million green jobs, but so far some $90 billion in government spending has delivered very few." (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
"The Green Economy Is Not Proving To Be The Job-Creation Engine That Many Politicians Envisioned." "In the Bay Area as in much of the country, the green economy is not proving to be the job-creation engine that many politicians envisioned. President Obama once pledged to create five million green jobs over 10 years. Gov. Jerry Brown promised 500,000 clean-technology jobs statewide by the end of the decade. But the results so far suggest such numbers are a pipe dream." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
Green Technology Jobs Account For Just 2 Percent Of Employment Nationwide. "A study released in July by the non-partisan Brookings Institution found clean-technology jobs accounted for just 2 percent of employment nationwide and only slightly more -- 2.2 percent -- in Silicon Valley. Rather than adding jobs, the study found, the sector actually lost 492 positions from 2003 to 2010 in the South Bay, where the unemployment rate in June was 10.5 percent." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
"Federal And State Efforts To Stimulate Creation Of Green Jobs Have Largely Failed." "Federal and state efforts to stimulate creation of green jobs have largely failed, government records show. Two years after it was awarded $186 million in federal stimulus money to weatherize drafty homes, California has spent only a little over half that sum and has so far created the equivalent of just 538 full-time jobs in the last quarter, according to the State Department of Community Services and Development." (Aaron Glantz, "Number Of Green Jobs Fails To Live Up To Promises," The New York Times, 8/18/11)
The Energy Department Has Handed Out $35.2 Billion From The Stimulus, But The Clean Energy Industry Has "Yet To Provide The Boost Many Had Hoped For." "The Energy Department handed out $35.2 billion from the Recovery Act for energy efficiency and other initiatives. At the time, clean energy was seen as a potentially powerful industry for job creation. But the industry has yet to provide the boost many had hoped for." (Vauhini Vara, "Red Flags For Green Energy," The Wall Street Journal, 10/12/11)
Despite Soaring Promises From Obama And His Allies, Green Energy Has Barely Taken Flight And Has Failed To Create Jobs. "New clean-energy sources could address environmental, economic and national security problems all at once. In his 2008 convention speech, Barack Obama promised to create five million green economy jobs. The U.S. Conference of Mayors estimated in April 2009 that green jobs could account for 10 percent of new job growth over the next 30 years. Alas, it was not to be." (David Brooks, "Where The Jobs Aren't," The New York Times, 9/5/11)
"There's A Wealth Of Other Evidence To Suggest That The Green Economy Will Not Be A Short-Term Jobs Machine. According To Investor's Business Daily, Executives At Johnson Controls Turned $300 Million In Green Technology Grants Into 150 Jobs -- That's $2 Million Per Job." (David Brooks, "Where The Jobs Aren't," The New York Times, 9/5/11)
The Energy Department's Loan Program Has Fallen Far Short Of The 65,000 Jobs That It Said It Would Create
"In The Understatement Of The Year, The IG Says The Program Failed To 'Assist Those Most Impacted By The Recession." "A new report by the Labor Department's Office of Inspector General examined a $500 million grant under the stimulus program to the Employment and Training Administration to 'train and prepare individuals for careers in 'green jobs.' So far about $162.8 million has been spent. The program was supposed to train 125,000 workers, but only 53,000 have been 'trained' so far, only 8,035 have found jobs, and only 1,033 were still in the job after six months. Overall, 'only 10% of participants entered employment.' In the understatement of the year, the IG says the program failed to 'assist those most impacted by the recession.'" (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
Obama's $38 Billion Green Energy Stimulus Program Only Has A Few Thousand Jobs To Show For It. "A $38.6 billion loan guarantee program that the Obama administration promised would create or save 65,000 jobs has created just a few thousand jobs two years after it began, government records show. The program -- designed to jump-start the nation's clean technology industry by giving energy companies access to low-cost, government-backed loans -- has directly created 3,545 new, permanent jobs after giving out almost half the allocated amount, according to Energy Department tallies." (Carol D. Leonnig and Steven Mufson, "Obama Green-Tech Program That Backed Solyndra Struggles To Create Jobs," The Washington Post, 9/14/11)
"The Jobs Record Is Even More Dismal When You Consider That Many Of The Jobs Classified As Green Aren't Even New Jobs, Much Less Green." "The jobs record is even more dismal when you consider that many of the jobs classified as green aren't even new jobs, much less green, according to a report from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. They include positions that have been 'relabeled as green jobs by the BLS [Bureau of Labor Statistics].'" (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
The Cost Of Each Green Job Is $157,000. "This means that bus drivers, Environmental Protection Agency regulators, university professors teaching ecology, and even the Washington lobbyists who secure energy loan guarantees count as green employees for the purposes of government counting. The Oversight Committee finds that even a charitable assessment of the Labor program puts the cost of each green job at $157,000." (Editorial, "Green Jobs Brown Out," The Wall Street Journal, 10/11/11)
HOME FORECLOSURES
PROMISE: President Obama Promised That His Housing Program Would Prevent 7 To 9 Million Families From Foreclosure. "And we will pursue the housing plan I'm outlining today. And through this plan, we will help between 7 and 9 million families restructure or refinance their mortgages so they can afford--avoid foreclosure." (President Barack Obama, Remarks On The Home Mortgage Industry In Mesa, Arizona, 2/18/09)
FAILURE: Obama Has Only Helped 1.7 Million Avoid Foreclosure Of The 9 Million Homeowners He Promised. "President Obama pledged at the beginning of his term to boost the nation's crippled housing market and help as many as 9 million homeowners avoid losing their homes to foreclosure. Nearly three years later, it hasn't worked out. Obama has spent just $2.4 billion of the $50 billion he promised. The initiatives he announced have helped 1.7 million people." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
The Administration's Foreclosure Prevention Programs "Have Had Little Impact On The Overall Housing Sector." "The administration is already using taxpayer funds from its $700 billion bank bailout program to help prevent foreclosures and give struggling Americans a reprieve on their mortgage payments. But the programs have had little impact on the overall housing sector." ("White House Says Needs To Deal With Housing Problems," Reuters, 6/5/11)
"To Date, Administration Programs Have Permanently Reduced The Debt Of Just One Tenth Of 1 Percent Of Underwater Borrowers." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
Obama's Housing Programs "Dramatically Underperformed"
This Summer At The White House, Obama Offered A Rare Acknowledgment That His Response To The Housing Crisis Had Fallen Short." (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
Obama Said That Housing Has Been The "Most Stubborn In Us Trying To Solve The Problem." "Asked what mistakes he had made in handling the recession and what he would do differently, he said: 'We had to revamp housing several times to try and help people stay in their homes and try to start lifting home values up. Of all the things we've done, that's probably been the area that's been most stubborn in us trying to solve the problem.'" (Zachary A. Goldfarb, "Obama's Efforts To Aid Homeowners, Boost Housing Market Fall Far Short Of Goals," The Washington Post, 10/23/11)
President Obama Said "I'll Be Honest With You, [Housing] Is Probably The Biggest Drag On The Economy Right Now." "'I'll be honest with you, this is probably the biggest drag on the economy right now,' Obama replied to a questioner at an economic forum in Palo Alto, Calif., who lamented that the 'housing crisis will not go away.'" (Abby Phillip, "Housing Crisis Back On President Obama's Agenda," Politico, 7/11/11)
Treasury Secretary Geithner: "But Our Programs Have Dramatically Underperformed What We Thought. ... We Are Very Disappointed And Frustrated By It And We Have A Lot Of Challenges Ahead." (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Testimony Before The House Financial Services Committee, Washington, D.C., 10/6/11)
DEFICIT SPENDING
Obama Promised To Cut The Deficit In Half, But Has Failed To Even Present A Plan That Would Bring The Deficit To Those Levels
PROMISE: Obama Pledged To Cut The Deficit In Half By The End Of His First Term. OBAMA:"And that's why today I'm pledging to cut the deficit we inherited by half by the end of my first term in office." (President Barack Obama, Remarks At The Fiscal Responsibility Summit, Washington, D.C., 2/23/09)
"President Barack Obama Plans To Cut The U.S. Budget Deficit To $533 Billion By The End Of His First Term ..." (Hans Nichols, "Obama Plans To Reduce Budget Deficit To $533 Billion By 2013," Bloomberg, 2/21/09)
One White House Official Told Politico "We'll Cut It At Least In Half." "Under White House projections, this year's inherited budget deficit of $1.3 trillion will be cut to $533 billion by fiscal year 2013, the end of the first term. 'So we'll cut it at least in half,' the official said." (Mike Allen, "Obama Vows To Cut Huge Deficit In Half," Politico, 2/22/09)
FAILURE: Even If Every Part Of Obama's Deficit Reduction Proposal Was Enacted, The Deficit At The End Of His First Term Would Still Be $1.33 Trillion, Over Double What He Promised. ("The President's Plan For Economic Growth And Deficit Reduction; Table S-3," Office Of Management And Budget, 9/19/11)
Politifact: "Obama Made A Pledge To Cut The Deficit In Half By The End Of His First Term. And He's Falling Short So Far." (Gregory Trotter, "Tim Pawlenty Says President Obama Is Going To Break Promise On Deficit And Will Double It," Politifact, 6/10/11)
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner Said Even If Congress Enacted The President's Budget "We Would Still Be Left With A Very Large Interest Burden And Unsustainable Obligations Over Time." (Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, Remarks Before Senate Budget Committee, Washington, D.C., 2/17/11)
In Doing So The "Undisputed Debt King" Has Put The Economy At Risk
At $15.22 Trillion, The National Debt Has Officially Surpassed 100 Percent Of GDP. (Treasury Direct, Accessed 1/3/12; Bureau Of Economic Analysis, Accessed 1/3/12)
The Nation's GDP Is $15.18 Trillion. (Bureau Of Economic Analysis, Accessed 1/3/12)
Politifact: "Obama Is The Undisputed Debt King Of The Last Five Presidents." "So by this measurement -- potentially a more important one -- Obama is the undisputed debt king of the last five presidents, rather than the guy who added a piddling amount to the debt, as Pelosi's chart suggested." ("Nancy Pelosi Posts Questionable Chart On Debt Accumulation By Barack Obama, Predecessors," Politifact, 5/19/11)
"By The Time The Next Election Rolls Around, The Government Will Have Taken On Almost $7 Trillion In Debt Under Obama. It's Hard To Explain Away A Number So Big." "For that reason alone, it is unimaginable that debt doesn't become an even bigger issue in the presidential election. The size-of-government spat is a hard one for the president to win. By the time the next election rolls around, the government will have taken on almost $7 trillion in debt under Obama. It's hard to explain away a number so big." (Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, "President Obama's Big Drags," Politico, 8/4/11)
By The Next Election Obama Will Have Added "$22,500 In New Debt For Every Man, Woman And Child In The Nation." (Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, "President Obama's Big Drags," Politico, 8/4/11)
The Government Is In A Debt Trap That Could Be Fueling The Recession. "Our recession may be driven, at this point, by the balance sheet of the government. Repairing that balance sheet by lowering spending may be the only way out of the debt trap. Call it the New Paradox of Thrift: the government can stimulate growth only by refusing to borrow. We need thrift all the way down." (John Carney, "From Jackson Hole: A Defense Of The Debt Ceiling," CNBC, 8/29/11)
CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf: Growing Debt Increases Risk Of "Sudden Fiscal Crisis." "Growing debt also would increase the probability of a sudden fiscal crisis, during which investors would lose confidence in the government's ability to manage its budget and the government would thereby lose its ability to borrow at affordable rates." (Douglas Elmendorf, "CBO's 2011 Long-Term Budget Outlook," Congressional Budget Office "Director's Blog", 6/22/11)
•Location: Malibu , CA 90265
|
|
| |
Apps data trends/stats/new 2012 Laws said... January 15, 2012 @ 4:38:51 PM EST
|
|
| |
Developed apps for PPC/Profit Website income ***Page 1 of 256 MILLION! - $58995 (Del Mar)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2012-01-15, 1:30PM PST
Reply to: see below [Errors when replying to ads?]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recent related Stories/facts... This is for Ownership of http://www.MittApps.com > Mitt Romney Apps < Populated interface keywords by Top 1% Worldwide expert Stanley(Stan) Krol
National Weather Service Bans Mobile App Development
The agency will rely on private apps developed using National Weather Service data rather than developing apps itself, but weather service union is calling the move tantamount to privatization.
By J. Nicholas Hoover InformationWeek
January 10, 2012 02:00 PM
Slideshow: 14 Most Popular Government Mobile Apps
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)The National Weather Service has put a hold on the use of internal resources to develop device-specific mobile application for iPhones, Androids, or iPads, and the federal agency's union is not happy about it.
Although numerous federal agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the White House, have jumped into mobile application development with apps for Android and Apple iOS, others, including the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and now the National Weather Service, are holding off, deciding instead to allow the private sector to develop apps for the public that are powered by agency data. Some open-government advocates also have questioned whether agencies should be developing apps or just enabling the private sector to do it.
More Government Insights
White Papers
•The Instant-On Enterprise: Business and Government white paper
•State and local governments target next-generation mobility
More >>
Reports
•Federal Data Centers: Server Virtualization
•Government: IT Project Management: Adopting Lightweight Methods
More >>
Webcasts
•Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
More >>However, the agency's union, the National Weather Service Employees Organization, has raised concerns that the new policy is akin to privatization of the National Weather Service, which the union has been fighting for years, and counter to the wider policy of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, of which the National Weather Service is a part.
Despite these concerns, National Weather Service data already powers countless mobile apps, including one from the Weather Channel, and is used by other popular apps such as WeatherBug, Radar Now, and an app from Weather Underground.
"There are thousands of weather applications available," National Weather Service deputy director Laura Furgione wrote in a memo to weather service employees on Dec. 21. "Many of them are provided at little or no cost. Many of them use National Weather Service products and some explicitly identify NWS as the source of their information. Given this market, NWS is declaring a hold on use of any NWS resources to develop such applications."
The memo doesn't rule out the possibility that the NWS might develop such an app in the future, and instead says that the move is intended partially to "give NWS time to carefully evaluate our appropriate role."
In response, the weather service's union called the memo "demoraliz[ing]," and asked NOAA administrator Jan Lubchenco to direct Furgione to rescind the memo. "In this fast moving world, the only way for NOAA and its line offices to achieve our mission is to grow with changing technology, and because what we offer is a service to the American public, clearly we must be on the cutting edge of communication technology," union president Dan Sobien wrote. "Tying our members' hands is counterproductive."
Call or Text to 561-TEXTED.MOBI
|
|
| |
Bad for Jobs said... January 21, 2012 @ 2:44:05 AM EST
|
|
| |
Obama’s Decision To Kill The Keystone Pipeline Reflects His Broken Promises To Create Jobs And Bring The Country Together
Click To Watch
MSNBC’S Joe Scarborough: “We haven't talked about one issue that on any other day we'd be talking about nonstop. A big policy decision yesterday by the Obama administration. I must say, I don't understand it for a lot of different reasons, but I'm going to let you guys comment on it. Keystone, the president killed the permitting for Keystone. And I'm just wondering, wouldn't this be a good issue for him to reach out to the middle on? Am I wrong about that?”
Time’s Joe Klein: “No, the campaign this year is like the stupid Olympics. These guys -- Obama just made, I think, a very big mistake at a time when we have 9% unemployment, the one most important consideration in any political decision is jobs. And whether there are 2,500 jobs or 2,000 jobs, you go with it.”
Scarborough: “What’s the motivation inside the White House? Because the president -- the president wants to win independent voters. He wants jobs, he wants more energy. What is the hold up here?
Klein: “He wants his base.”
Scarborough: “The base would not forgive him for this?”
Klein: “College campuses, there’s a lot of environmental sentiment, this is a big issue.”
Time’s Mark Halperin: “I don't think it's purely political. I think the president doesn't think this is the right -- that the country's ready to make the decision, primarily because of safety concerns. But I think it is reflective of the fact he has not brought the country together on controversial issues which he promised to do.” (MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” 1/19/12)
WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT OBAMA’S MISGUIDED MOVE ON KEYSTONE
Chicago Tribune: “Obama made a decision that will deny the U.S. a reliable source of oil. Note that Canada has never threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz. Obama made a decision that will cost the U.S. good jobs. He seems to think those jobs will still be there when he gets around to making a decision on the pipeline. But they may well be gone for good.” (Editorial, “Pipeline Politics: Misguided Obama Blocks Keystone Pipeline,” Chicago Tribune, 1/19/12)
The Washington Post: “But, clearly, constructing the pipeline would still result in job gains during a sluggish economic recovery.” (Editorial, “Obama’s Keystone Pipeline Rejection Is Hard To Accept,” The Washington Post, 1/18/12)
· The Washington Post: “We almost hope this was a political call because, on the substance, there should be no question. Without the pipeline, Canada would still export its bitumen — with long-term trends in the global market, it’s far too valuable to keep in the ground — but it would go to China. And, as a State Department report found, U.S. refineries would still import low-quality crude — just from the Middle East. Stopping the pipeline, then, wouldn’t do anything to reduce global warming, but it would almost certainly require more oil to be transported across oceans in tankers.” (Editorial, “Obama’s Keystone Pipeline Rejection Is Hard To Accept,” The Washington Post, 1/18/12)
Laborers’ International Union of North America: “Instead of celebrating their victory by hugging a tree they should hug a jobless construction worker because they’re the ones who are going to need it.” (Laborers’ International Union of North America , “Job-Killers, 2; American Workers, 0,” Press Release, 1/18/12)
· Laborers’ International Union of North America Called Obama’s Decision “Politics At Its Worst.” “‘The score is Job-Killers, two; American workers, zero. We are completely and totally disappointed. This is politics at its worst,’ LIUNA General President Terry O’Sullivan said. ‘Once again the President has sided with environmentalists instead of blue collar construction workers – even though environmental concerns were more than adequately addressed. Blue collar construction workers across the U.S. will not forget this.’” (Laborers’ International Union of North America , “Job-Killers, 2; American Workers, 0,” Press Release, 1/18/12)
|
|
| |
2012 GOP Web JOBS said... January 23, 2012 @ 7:43:52 PM EST
|
|
| |
Seeking 10-20 Workers with Laptops,Tablets or smartphones for training this week. Temp position till July 2012. Sample site is Mitt Romney App Apps GOP Pac/funds offered. www.MittApps.com and others! CALL ASAP!
Do you have a project that qualifies for funding with the exception of a strong team?
We can supply global ‘shovel ready’ projects with an experienced project management team w/ track record. Sectors such as oil and gas, renewable energy (wind, solar, bio fuels) infrastructure (airports, hospitals, marinas, ports) large scale property developments, be it commercial, high rise, residential, industrial or leisure etc. are of interest. All countries with stable economies and Government will be considered.
We are seeking global projects in these SECTORS that require design build, funding referral:
marina, zoological park, eco-tourism, supermarket chain, convenience store, gas station, theme park, motorsport, restaurant, franchise, race track, indoor snow ski, snowdome, casino, amusement, hotels, transit, railroad, monorail, ship, seaport, ports, terminal, golf, shopping mall, airport, urban entertainment center, office complex, high rise, central business district, electric power, college, recreation, waterpark, movie production set, timeshare resorts, dinner theatre, hospital, others
Please note that in addition to hotel design/construction/management ; we do fully integrated resorts, CBD mixed use developments, short term, long term and permanent residential, family entertainment centers, race tracks, retail, commercial, and office complexes, marinas, ships, boats, steam locomotive, tourist railroads, full infrastructure including waste management, paving, Light Rail Transport and Swiss mono-rail transportation. We also have golf course design and exclusive night golf system. Our networked associates have a proven track record on all aspects of construction and operation which includes theme park design and development.
HOTEL MANAGEMENT
Our consortium is not only equal to the task, but far superior and without equal. Whilst we are low key we don't seek nor do we want the limelight or high profile publicity.
The major differences we operate under are that we do not demand franchise fees, do not irrevocably lock the owner into excessive long term contracts which are not fair or equitable on both parties. We do not demand mandatory high contributions to pool sales & marketing which is ineffective by not benefiting an individual property. Each property retains its individual identity and uniqueness. Standard operating procedures [SOPs] are not generic but are written specifically for each property. We have a depth of senior management from the "top luxury chains" hospitality from the heart, providing a more cost effective, much more efficient operation.
Our service has a competitive edge on all other management companies, provides greater guest satisfaction, loyalty and repeat guests, higher staff satisfaction and stability resulting in a higher ROI for the owner.
The point I emphasis, is that whilst we are most efficient, cost effective and amenable to negotiation, we are in the luxury market, do not cut corners, do not deviate from our terms and conditions nor do we drop our fees or standards.
Most sincerely yours in hospitality,
Stan Krol Entrepreneur, Director general
One of our senior project directors is now completing assignment with SF REIT.
One of our senior project managers is located in Florida.
We offer to send bio of one or more of our hotel development managers.
"investor find"
http://www.corporationwiki.com/New-Hampshire/ ...
We decided to proceed with your West Coast project managers: Please contact Mr. Stanley(Stan)Krol CEO at this link for Business and Trustee Information.
The Largest groups would be American Land Trusts Inc & Lift Putter LLC http://www.corporationwiki.com/New-Hampshire/ ... |
|
| |
www.SelfDeportation.org said... January 24, 2012 @ 2:38:18 AM EST
|
|
| |
Self Deportation statement said...
January 24, 2012 @ 2:29:13 AM EST
Romney on immigration: I'm for "self-deportation" By Lucy Madison Topics Campaign 2012 .9 Comments Have Your Say Email Story Send to a Friend Share This Tell Your Friends Tweet This Tweet ThisMore Share It. Del.icio.us Facebook Stumbleupon Newsvine Yahoo bookmarks Mixx Digg Reddit Google Bookmarks Twitter LinkedIn In Monday night's Republican presidential debate out of Florida, Mitt Romney described his plan for reducing the number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S.: "www.self-deportation.org" The former Massachusetts governor was responding to a question about his immigration position by Adam Smith, the political editor at "The Tampa Bay Times," who said he was "confused" about his stance on deportation. "Governor Romney, there is one thing I'm confused about. You say you don't want to go and round up people and deport them, but you also say that they would have to go back to their home countries and then apply for citizenship. So, if you don't deport them, how do you send them home?" Smith asked. Romney said "we're not going to round people up" but rather, financially struggling undocumented immigrants would choose to return to their home countries of their own volition. "The answer is self-deportation, which is people decide they can do better by going home because they can't find work here because they don't have legal documentation to allow them to work here," he said. "And so we're not going to round people up." The former governor explained: "The way that we have in this society is to say, look, people who have come here legally would, under my plan, be given a transition period and the opportunity during that transition period to work here, but when that transition period was over, they would no longer have the documentation to allow them to work in this country. At that point, they can decide whether to remain or whether to return home and to apply for legal residency in the United States, get in line with everybody else. And I know people think but that's not fair to those that have come here illegally." "Isn't that what we have now?" asked Smith, who pointed out that "If somebody doesn't feel they have the opportunity in America, they can go back any time they want to." Romney suggested his administration would make it harder for illegal immigrants to get jobs, which would in turn lead them to seek work elsewhere. "We'd have a card that indicates who's here illegally," he said. "And if people are not able to have a card, and have through an E-Verify system determine that they are here illegally, then they're going to find they can't get work here. And if people don't get work here, they're going to self-deport to a place where they can get work." He said that then people could "get in line at home" and come to the country legally once they "reached the front of the line." Earlier in the discussion, Romney said that, like Gingrich, he would support a version of legislation that would allow some young immigrants, brought to the country illegally, to earn citizenship by serving in the military. "That's the same position that I have, and that is that I would not sign the DREAM Act as it currently exists, but I would sign the DREAM Act if it were focused on military service," Romney said, echoing Gingrich's stated position on the topic. The issue of immigration is likely to play a huge factor this election in Florida, a diverse state with an increasingly large Hispanic population. In the Republican nomination contest, Gingrich has taken a softer position on the issue than his rival: the former speaker has favored granting amnesty to those who have lived in the country for a long time and have families here; Romney, on the other hand, has recently said such a policy would encourage illegal immigration. MORE DEBATE COVERAGE: Domain servers in listed order: www.Selfdeportation.us NS15.DOMAINCONTROL.COM NS16.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
|
|
| |
Sunshine State Polls said... January 30, 2012 @ 8:59:08 PM EST
|
|
| |
CAMPAIGN 2012| FLORIDA PRIMARY
Newt Gingrich looks like a goner in Fla. — but by how much?
By Marc Caputo The Miami Herald
Early ballots, yet uncounted, may transform Mitt Romney’s expected win into a rout over Newt Gingrich.
Republican presidential candidate former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks during campaign stop, Monday, Jan. 30, 2012, in Fort Myers, Fla. Matt Rourke / AP PhotoFullsize Buy Photoprevious | nextImage 1 of 2
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney campaigns at Pioneer Park in Dunedin, Fla., Monday, Jan. 30, 2012. Charles Dharapak / AP PhotoFullsize Buy Photoprevious | nextImage 2 of 2Photos
Vote today
Polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
PRIMARY
Registered Republicans can vote for a presidential candidate:
• Newt Gingrich
• Ron Paul
• Mitt Romney
• Rick Santorum
AMENDMENTS
Miami-Dade County residents can vote on:
Term limits and salary boost: Should county commissioners be held to eight-year term limits and be banned from outside employment, while boosting their salaries to about $92,097 a year?
Petition period: Should the time allotted to obtain sufficient signatures to place a citizen initiative on the ballot be doubled?
Where to vote Tuesday
Bring a current and valid identification that contains your name, photograph and signature. If you do not have a valid and current identification, you may be asked to vote using a provisional ballot. You could also bring your Voter Information Card. It’s not required, but it will help speed up the process.
Acceptable forms of identification include:
• Florida Driver’s License
• Florida identification card issued by the Dept. of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
• United States Passport
• Debit or credit card
• Military identification
• Student identification
• Retirement center identification
• Public assistance identification
• Neighborhood Association identification
To learn more:
• Miami-Dade: www.miamidade.gov/elections/home.asp
• Broward: www.browardsoe.org or call 954-357-7050
SOURCES: Miami-Dade Elections Department; Broward County Supervisor of Elections Office
More information
MiamiHerald.com/
voters-guide
By Marc Caputo
mcaputo@MiamiHerald.com
Whether it’s 5, 7, 11 or 14 percentage points, all the major polls agree: Newt Gingrich should lose Election Day in Florida.
But Florida doesn’t have just one Election Day. It has a month’s worth of them because voters can cast absentee ballots by mail or go to special early-voting precincts for a 10-day stretch that ended Saturday.
At least 632,000 Republicans have already cast ballots.
So Gingrich could be losing by as many as 60,000 votes before the polls even open Tuesday, according to an analysis of early-voter surveys and the averages of all the major statewide polls applied to the pool of already cast ballots.
“I think Gingrich could be losing more to Mitt Romney — like 75,000ish,” said Randy Nielsen, a top Florida political consultant for the Republican Party of Florida who’s not affiliated with any presidential candidate.
“This election isn’t going to be pretty for Newt Gingrich,” Nielsen said. “He didn’t have a program to get early and absentee votes, and Gingrich is losing to Mitt Romney in every region except for North Florida. But he’s not winning there enough to make up the difference.”
The actual number of early ballots won by the candidates won't become known until after Election Day.
And Gingrich could be doing much better if his campaign somehow managed to get voters to flock to early-voting precincts and cast absentee ballots in numbers that well exceed the average estimates of nearly 30 scientific surveys that have a 4 percent error margin. Factor that in, and Gingrich could trail Romney by about 42,000 votes.
When absentee-ballot voting began at the beginning of the year, only Romney aggressively courted early voters. For more than a month, his campaign has called and mailed voters and reached them on Spanish- and English-language television and radio.
Gingrich was late in contacting voters, advertising in Florida and campaigning here, relative to Romney.
Still, the advertising has been so heavy on Miami’s Spanish-language airwaves that a WQBA-AM (1140) host apologized to readers that some shows had been cut short to accommodate all the political spots. Up to 2 million Republicans could vote in this election.
Nielsen released a statewide poll, conducted two days ago with Republican Party consultant Pat Bainter, showing Romney leading Gingrich, 40-30 percent. The lead is consistent with the findings of a Miami Herald/El Nuevo Herald/Tampa Bay Times survey released Sunday.
Like the Herald/Times poll, the survey from Nielsen showed Romney pulling well ahead in South Florida. Gingrich looks strongest in conservative North Florida and they’re basically tied in Tampa Bay, where the candidates made last-minute stops on Monday.
Speaking at a Jacksonville forklift supply company, Romney reminded the crowd that Gingrich was a paid consultant for mortgage giant Freddie Mac as the housing foreclosure crisis deepened.
Romney also mocked Gingrich’s campaign speech last week on the Space Coast, where he promised to push for a lunar colony as president.
“The idea of the moon as the 51st state is not what would come to my mind as a campaign basis for here in Florida,” Romney said.
Gingrich jetted across the state Monday and insisted that he was still in the game — despite a slew of publicly released polls Sunday and Monday showing him losing by anywhere from 5- to 20-percentage points.
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/01/30/2616278/newt-gingrich-looks-like-a-goner.html#storylink=cpy |
|
| |
Self Deport Comments on blog said... February 01, 2012 @ 8:12:43 PM EST
|
|
| |
Daniel D. Portado sends “Cease and Desist” notice to SelfDeport.org: “I Invented Self-Deportation”
Posted: January 27, 2012 | Author: Patriots for Self-Deportation | Filed under: Blog |Leave a comment »
Patriots: We have just received a Cease and Desist notice from Radical right wing Mexican-American activist Daniel D. Portado, founder of HALTO (Hispanics Against Liberal Takeover), citing his exclusive copyright on the term Self-Deportation. “Daniel D. Portado invented Self Deportation in 1994,” he wrote, “when your hip accessories were wet diapers and a chupon!” We are not sure what a “chuppon” is (is it like a Clap-On/Clap-Off?), but Mr. D. Portado seems very serious indeed. Although his concept of Self Deportation applied, like Mitt Romney’s, to Hispanic immigrants only, he is outraged, saying: “Mojados take everything, but not Daniel’s wonderful ideas. SELF-DEPORTATION is mine! Now DEPORT YOURSELF!”
Luckily for us, that’s the idea.
Here’s an excerpt of a 1996 episode of This American Life that featured Mr. D. Portado:
Man:Hey, Pedro. Go back to Mexico, stop taking our jobs, and stop looking at my daughter!
Daniel D. Portado: Immigrants, are you tired of being pushed around in America? Well, don’t sit on your serape. Do something about it. Join the conservative political action group HALTO– Hispanics Against Liberal Takeover.
Announcer 1: HALTO was formed by Mexicali karaoke lounge sensation Daniel D. Portado as a way to spread California Governor Pete Wilson’s message of self-deportation to a national audience.
Daniel D. Portado: I am the chairman of HALTO, Daniel D. Portado. What is self-deportation, you ask? Think of it as a permanent vacation. Just imagine, in one easy step, you can avoid all this crazy anti-immigrant harassment in America. How? Self-deportation. Just imagine yourself on the beach, in Mazatlan, relaxed, tension-free. Immigrants, join HALTO today and see your homeland tomorrow.
Announcer 1: Self-deportation is a trademark of Hispanics Against Liberal Takeover. Subject agrees to voluntarily repatriate to native land or Mexico, whichever is nearest. All self-deportations are final. No exchanges or refunds. Tickets are one way only.
And here is an interview he gave recently: “Daniel D. Portado: The Original Self-Deportationist“
Share this:
Twitter2
Facebook11
Like this:
Like
Be the first to like this post.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leave a reply on “Daniel D. Portado sends “Cease and Desist” notice to SelfDeport.org: “I Invented Self-Deportation””
Stan Krol
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
February 1, 2012 at 7:58 pm
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
February 1, 2012 at 7:38 pm
I Support this website and WILL BACK YOU IN ANY U.S Court or Mexican Court, But not Tribal Courts.(0 for 1 in Connecticut on that one)How can I help also… Watching your site for future campaign SUPER PAC FUNDS donators(Fund managers/using money from 1%ers) on any of the current issues including legal deportation and may branch out on my own. CIO admin & Domain owner of http://www.SelfDeportation.org and http://www.Self-Deportation.org . Mitt Romneys Cambridge, Ma. group owns the dot com. I support Mitt and endorse the GOP for 2012.
Regards,
Stanley(Stan)Krol Entreprenuer
Reply
Stan Krol
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
February 1, 2012 at 8:02 pm
FYI….
Mitt Romneys Father was born in Mexico.. His campaign owns Self Deportation .com
Reply
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leave a Reply
Enter your comment here... 561-TEXTED-MOBI Mobile app/apps for free downloads. Lift Putters LLC assets and tech jobs on web. |
|
| |
Contact Stan Krol CIO admin said... February 07, 2012 @ 10:23:53 PM EST
|
|
| |
Last night, Mitt Romney stepped up to fill a non-existent void in the English language, using a new phrase we can’t get enough of: “self-deportation.”
By taking the word “deportation”, which connotes a forced dismissal, and tacking on the prefix “self,” Romney came up with a little term that seemingly contradicts itself. An oxymoron, if you will.
Responding to a question regarding illegal immigration, Romney offered up this answer:
“Well, the answer is self-deportation, which is people decide they can do better by going home because they can’t find work here because they don’t have legal documentation to allow them to work here."
The audience giggled as soon as the candidate uttered the foreign phrase and Romney’s explanation left many scratching their heads. The candidate advocates making life hard enough for undocumented immigrants that they make the choice to return home.
Our understanding of the word “deportation,” however, is that the immigrant doesn’t quite have a choice in the matter. And making life hard for immigrants doesn't quite seem to be a new idea (see: Arizona's controversial SB 1070 immigration law, Alabama's HB 56, etc.)
Because to deport oneself would not be deportation at all, it seems maybe the word Romney was looking for was “to emigrate”, “to return”, or “to leave”. But Romney’s not messing with those fancy dictionary words.
Latino blogger Lili Gil wrote that the term displays the candidate is “out of touch” with Latino voters.
"Immediately, a flood of live tweets from viewers, political insiders and Latino influencers jumped to criticize his confusing answer," Gil wrote in a column for Fox News Latino.
While some criticize the new phrase, it certainly opens up a whole new set of possibilities in our lexicon.
Swapping “self-deportation” in the place of “choosing to leave” (which it seems to actually mean) one could say:
"This bar is lame. Let's self deport.” Or, “The GOP’s anti-immigrant rhetoric may prompt Latinos to self-deport from the party.”
A new Twitter account even sprung up after the debate. The user, @Self_deporter, asks his followers what kind of protocol is necessary in "self-deportation."
"Do you need a passport to self-deport? Still new to this... #FingersCrossed #Romney," the user tweeted.
@Self_deporter's tweets open a host of questions about how "self-deportation" might work. Will there be self-detention centers where undocumented immigrants will be self detained until they're ready to self deport? We're not sure yet.
Born in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, Romney's own father chose to move to the U.S. We wonder if, in fact, he "self-deported" to America with the hopes that his son might have greater opportunities than he did. Heck, maybe his son would even run for President someday.
|
|
| |
True Americans unite said... February 09, 2012 @ 1:33:23 AM EST
|
|
| |
Copy,Paste and Forward this message to blogs,social media and your Family and Friends.
A growing force within the Tea Party and beyond, Patriots for Self-Deportation believe that securing our borders is not enough. We must make sure that all residents and “citizens” have a true right to be in this great land. We believe our current laws must be changed to abolish anchor babies, whose children, throughout history, should have never received automatic citizenship to this nation. If the Federal government will not take action NOW, then it is up to us, WE THE PEOPLE, to put an end to the invasion and internal decay that threatens to destroy the fabric of the USA. If you entered illegally or stayed illegally, you are a CRIMINAL. We demand a purge for The Real America.
We hold FOUR CORE VALUES:
1) America belongs to REAL Americans.
2) Illegals and their anchor babies are here ILLEGALLY.
3) US citizenship is for those who can show PROOF their original ancestors were here legally.
4) All illegals and descendants of illegals are here ILLEGALLY and must be DEPORTED at once.
If you can’t prove you belong here, you must REPATRIATE.***Support the Business ads on www.SelfDeportation.org ***Paypal links Donate to website. Look at your Cities! How many more can we take? We must start something strong, a positive movement, so please contact your local Politician or email/call your Governor!
Many of us have learned that we gained citizenship due to a criminal ancestor.
If this is true for you too, do what’s right: Self-Deport!
Until the 14th Amendment is changed, stopping illegal citizenship begins with US!
–2012 PAC Funds/Donation sponsor from: American Land Trusts Inc. Stan Krol CIO admin.
This site is made possible in part by:
TRUE EARLY AMERICANS WHO FOUGHT, DIED, AND INVESTED TO PROTECT OUR USA BORDERS AND AMERICAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS! |
|
| |
More to debate said... February 10, 2012 @ 12:27:25 AM EST
|
|
| |
Romney steals "self-deport"
By Andy Bichlbaum on Jan 28 2012 - 1:23pm Tagged: Project: Patriots for Self-Deportation
January 26, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Megan Hanley, selfdeport@gmail.com
Phone: (717) 585-0628
Stranger than Fiction: Romney Steals “Self-Deport” Idea from Satirical Website
Activists furious at GOP Candidate, Exploring Legal Options
New York, NY -- Five months ago, in an effort to draw attention to the bigoted nature of the current debate around immigration in the United States, a group of activists got together to come up with the most outlandish approach imaginable to immigration issues: Self-deportation. The result-- www.SelfDeport.org-- launched last fall, cheerily reminding Americans unsure about the status of their immigrant forebearers that "Stopping Illegal Citizenship Starts with You."
During this past Monday night’s GOP debate, Mitt Romney stole the idea and passed it off as his own.
The “Repatriotas,” a group of artists and activists affiliated with the Yes Lab at the Hemispheric Institute of Performance and Politics, were shocked when Romney suggested that “The answer [to the immigration issue] is self-deportation.” The group built selfdeport.org as a satirical response to stepped-up deportations and an uptick of extreme anti-immigrant laws like SB 1070 in Arizona, HB 56 in Alabama, and the Secure Communities program, which deny basic rights to undocumented people and their families. And increasingly harsh and punitive responses to immigration are not just a partisan or GOP problem. Under the Obama administration a record 369,000 people were deported in 2011 alone-- far exceeding deportation rates under his Republican predecessor George W. Bush.
“The ‘go-back-home’ rhetoric is so over-the-top that we thought parody was the only sane response," said Marlène Ramírez-Cancio, a Repatriota and a member of the Latina video and satire collective Fulana. "We don't know how Romney first happened upon our website, but given the murky nature of his own family's legal status in the U.S., maybe he was just exploring his options," she says, referring to recent allegations that in the early twentieth century Romney's own family may have crossed the Mexico / US border without first securing the appropriate papers.
“The difference between Mitt Romney’s version of self-deportation and ours is he imagines a country where immigration issues can be solved by making immigrants’ lives so miserable, they’ll give up and leave. We want everyone who lives in this country to enjoy equal opportunity and rights,” said Cristel M. Jusino Díaz, a member of the group.
The Repatriotas work to draw attention to the challenges faced by undocumented youth in the U.S. They support federal and state legislation that would enable undocumented students to achieve their dreams of pursuing higher education and civic service.
The Repatriotas view “repatriation” as a logical extension of the “anchor baby” debates, or far-right proposals to modify the 14th Amendment with the intention of deny birthright citizenship for children of undocumented people. The site questions why descendants of European immigrants --many of whom also arrived and lived in the United States without proper documentation-- feel their own immigrant past is "different." The creators of selfdeport.org hope to spark a conversation about the idea of "The Real America" and who belongs in it.
The Repatriotas have contacted Romney’s campaign headquarters for comment. To date the campaign has not responded -- nor properly attributed the “Self-Deportation” idea to its authors.
|
|
| |
Not Left or Right Wing but the middle said... February 14, 2012 @ 4:03:23 PM EST
|
|
| |
Don't Call it Xenophobia and Don't Call it Racism
[This post was originaly written on September 28th, when ICE was conducting raids on employers of illegal immigrants.]
Fox news is covering the recent ICE raids on McDonalds (and other companies I think), and the accusations by Hispanic community leaders (who decides who a "community leader" is anyway?) that these raids are somehow "racist.'
I can sympathize with the plight of an immigrant who is in this country seeking a better life and seeking to provide for his/her family. Having lived in 3 different Central American countries as a missionary, so I can also sympathize with the plight of Latin Americans who are not able to provide for their families. I certainly can sympathize with the hardship created by corrupt governments in Latin America. BUT...and this is a MAJOR BUT...every action has consequences. Entering our country illegally has legal consequences, including deportation. This is standard. It may not have been enforced in the past, but not so anymore. Why is this suddenly a surprise? Everyone knows it was bound to happen eventually, and every illegal immigrant knows that this is always a possibility.
Now it is, and thank goodness some of our government officials are starting to do something about it. If you are here illegally, consider the price. This is not a race issue -- it is a simple "rule of law" issue.
Is there racism out there -- sure! I've seen it and experienced it myself. But considering the reasonable public outcry by a vast majority of citizens -- those who our government serves -- it is only logical that our government agencies (ICE) would start doing their job (they should have been doing for along time...). I wouldn't call that racism. I would call it the restoration of the rule of law.
My advice: If you are an illegal immigrant in the US, start planning a way to go back home. Get some savings, and work up a business plan to start a small business back home. I realize life in the US is so much better than in Latin America, but until citizens -- until Hondurans, Costa Ricans, Nicaraguans, Guatemalans, Mexicans, and others do something -- start protesting and pressuring THEIR governments to open up their markets, and provide business-friendly economies -- nothing is going to change. But here in the US, we still have to have a country of laws. This is, after all, what makes our economy so strong, so effective and so productive.
Ultimately, if the United States allow illegal immigrants to freely falsify identity papers, social security IDs and tax documents, this would weaken the integrity and trust we place in our systems--the very economy they are benefiting from.
I'm sorry...I really am, but that's how it has to be. I don't hate immigrants--my father is one. I don't fear Hispanics -- I am one and I am friends with many Hispanics or Latinos. This has nothing to do with it.
So, don't call it xenophobia and don't call it racism. No one is buying that around here...
|
|
| |
Stan Krol reviews facebook said... February 14, 2012 @ 5:10:50 PM EST
|
|
| |
Mix Red White and Blue States, I now see a Brown hue said...
May 05 2012, @ 12:00:01 AM MST(Time Machine Blogger)
Where are you hiding Carlos Slim? Don't Call it Xenophobia and Don't Call it Racism [This post was originaly written on September 28th, when ICE was conducting raids on employers of illegal immigrants.] Fox news is covering the recent ICE raids on McDonalds (and other companies I think), and the accusations by Hispanic community leaders (who decides who a "community leader" is anyway?) that these raids are somehow "racist.' I can sympathize with the plight of an immigrant who is in this country seeking a better life and seeking to provide for his/her family. Having lived in 3 different Central American countries as a missionary, so I can also sympathize with the plight of Latin Americans who are not able to provide for their families. I certainly can sympathize with the hardship created by corrupt governments in Latin America. BUT...and this is a MAJOR BUT...every action has consequences. Entering our country illegally has legal consequences, including deportation. This is standard. It may not have been enforced in the past, but not so anymore. Why is this suddenly a surprise? Everyone knows it was bound to happen eventually, and every illegal immigrant knows that this is always a possibility. Now it is, and thank goodness some of our government officials are starting to do something about it. If you are here illegally, consider the price. This is not a race issue -- it is a simple "rule of law" issue. Is there racism out there -- sure! I've seen it and experienced it myself. But considering the reasonable public outcry by a vast majority of citizens -- those who our government serves -- it is only logical that our government agencies (ICE) would start doing their job (they should have been doing for along time...). I wouldn't call that racism. I would call it the restoration of the rule of law. My advice: If you are an illegal immigrant in the US, start planning a way to go back home. Get some savings, and work up a business plan to start a small business back home. I realize life in the US is so much better than in Latin America, but until citizens -- until Hondurans, Costa Ricans, Nicaraguans, Guatemalans, Mexicans, and others do something -- start protesting and pressuring THEIR governments to open up their markets, and provide business-friendly economies -- nothing is going to change. But here in the US, we still have to have a country of laws. This is, after all, what makes our economy so strong, so effective and so productive. Ultimately, if the United States allow illegal immigrants to freely falsify identity papers, social security IDs and tax documents, this would weaken the integrity and trust we place in our systems--the very economy they are benefiting from. I'm sorry...I really am, but that's how it has to be. I don't hate immigrants--my father is one. I don't fear Hispanics -- I am one and I am friends with many Hispanics or Latinos. This has nothing to do with it. So, don't call it xenophobia and don't call it racism. No one is buying that around here... Buy this website domain.. Mix ALL These color-combos and I now see "GREEN" with envy and "DEAD PRESIDENTS" and maybe South of the Border trunks full of Blank______ coming North, Bring instead "PESOS" Self Deport blog income Worldwide 24/7/365 Days Self-Deportation Org www.SelfDeportation.org CIO/admin
|
|
| |
10% Paid Commission ONLY to TOP Attorney for Postive Results said... February 17, 2012 @ 6:59:11 PM EST
|
|
| |
Lawyer Needed before statute expires said...
February 17, 2012 @ 5:14:59 PM EST
Funding source was made by Stan Krol Investor with all Parties and Real Estate Brokers and agents. Have proof, and canceled checks before this LA Times Story became public and escrow numbers and Harry Mansdorf Trust and ALL PARTIES Claiming a power of attorney as of this date 02/17/2012 know this. He is Elderly and Ill and I must seek Legal statues on the prior contracts of purchase and transfer with Harry only before his Death. Statute of Limitations on Fraud, False funding contracts would expire on my matter would be in Late 2013. Deer Creek Inc. 1996 Nevada Shell/Broker of Record and MLS Listing Group total was > $152,100,000. PSA Signed by 4 Persons in all. Title insurance Policy was justed cleared. They rolled out the red carpet of course these greedy brokers and insider Lawyers for their causes and Companies. I Stanley Krol under oath makes this statement above. More to come as I did transport Deer Creek Documents from the 1960's on(Hundreds of pounds) from a Law firm in Thousand Oaks. Legal docs on 2 other properties with Stanley Krol/Owner of Record Malibu Lot since 08/22/1997 and Cantil , CA(Kern CO)Lost to Micheal Giacomazza Trustee and then Avondale Realty on secured note. Will prepare this case to trial as fast as possible. But they have a Powerful Harvard Attorney.
Call Stan in Malibu , Ca @ 424-781-5435 Regards,
New twist in battle over oceanfront land near Malibu A Los Angeles Superior Court judge finds that a developer threatened and tried to cheat an elderly former aircraft company owner out of the property. August 07, 2009|Bob PoolTwo-lane Deer Creek Road is full of tortuous twists and turns as it meanders across the canyons and ridgelines above Malibu's last three-mile stretch of undeveloped coastline. And the fight over ownership of 1,291 acres of rugged oceanfront mountain land west of the Los Angeles-Ventura county line has seen plenty of its own ups and downs and sharply narrow interpretations of motive. Ads by Google Selling Your Timeshare Fast Free and Easy Timeshare Value Reports For ALL Timeshare Resorts! Now Guaranteed exit program. No hidden or upfront fees. Free Instant Price Analysis! Sell or Rent Your Timeshare. www.TimeshareSellers.info The dispute reached a critical juncture this week when a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge ruled that a would-be developer used threats and fraud in an attempt to cheat an elderly former aircraft company owner out of the mountainous property. The decision means the seaside land worth hundreds of millions of dollars belongs to 88-year-old Harry Mansdorf, whose family purchased the acreage over a four-decade period with proceeds from its aircraft business, which included development of the famed Pregnant Guppy cargo plane. Ownership of the site and the family's $4-million mansion on Alta Drive in Beverly Hills had been claimed by Michele V. Giacomazza, who asserted he was a business partner of Mansdorf's deceased brother and for years managed their family's trust. Giacomazza, 69, of Camarillo, said that in 1977 Lee Mansdorf took him on as a general partner through an "irrevokable (sic) joint venture" and granted him unlimited power of attorney for the Malibu-area land and the Beverly Hills mansion. Harry Mansdorf said that after the death of Lee Mansdorf, Giacomazza used threats and intimidation to separate him and his wife, Linda, from both the residence and the sprawling coastal property. In a ruling that came after a month-long trial which included a mysterious threat against his life, Superior Court Judge Charles F. Palmer concluded that Mansdorf, through the family trust, is the owner of both the Malibu area land and the Beverly Hills estate. Palmer ruled that Giacomazza "proceeded to pressure, threaten and intimidate" Mansdorf and "intruded into (his) life on an almost daily basis, demeaning him and ordering him around." Giacomazza's attorney, Michael L. McQueen, said it has not yet been decided whether the ruling would be appealed. He denied, however, that his client engaged in intimidation. "Harry knew exactly what he was doing when he did it," McQueen said. At trial's end, McQueen called for Palmer to declare mistrial because of the threat, which was left on a courthouse answering machine. Palmer refused, explaining that Los Angeles County sheriff's deputies had investigated the threat and were unable to determine who made it. "It doesn't affect my view" of either side in the case, the judge said. The ruling is a relief to Mansdorf, who said he had nightmares about the threats he said Giacomazza made to his family. Ads by Google The Ritz-Carlton Club® Discover world-class luxury with The Ritz-Carlton Destination Club® Timeshare Cancellation Learn How to Cancel Your Timeshare. Free Consultations. Call us Today! Take Action "At first he acted like a friend. He said he was going to help me," Mansdorf said during a recent visit to the coastal property with his wife, lawyer John C. Torjesen and a friend, Jaime Gonzalez. From a hilltop off Deer Creek Road, the four could see much of the property's 2.7-mile coastline along Pacific Coast Highway. In the distance were Catalina, Anacapa, Santa Cruz and Santa Barbara islands. The property, which extends inland about a mile, surrounds two smaller parcels that are not part of the holding. Mansdorf, a B-24 bomber pilot in World War II who was taken prisoner by the Nazis, joined with other family members in an aircraft sales business after the war. Their most famous plane was the Pregnant Guppy, a bulbous cargo carrier that ferried moon rocket parts from the West Coast for NASA in the 1960s. According to Mansdorf, Giacomazza claimed his "partnership" after Lee Mansdorf's death in 2003. Giacomazza contended that a written 1977 agreement proved it. It was Gonzalez, a 47-year-old Downey businessman who had an earlier business relationship with the Mansdorfs, who first discovered a series of discrepancies in the purported partnership agreement, Torjesen said. Gonzalez said he noticed that the official stamp used by a Glendale notary public who witnessed the supposed 1977 partnership signing was not issued by the state until 1987 and that the notary's signature bore her married name, even though she did not marry and change her name until 1985, Torjesen said. McQueen brushed aside that contention, explaining in court papers that Harry Mansdorf had "acknowledged and authenticated" the agreement in the past. He declined after the trial to allow Giacomazza to be interviewed, explaining that he had suffered from strokes and aphasia, which cause memory and speech problems. Gonzalez said he would assist Harry Mansdorf in reviving the family's 20-year-old plan to develop the Malibu area property. That early proposal suggested that a golf course, a five-star hotel, a marina, shopping areas, condominiums and horse property-style estates could be built there. Torjesen said Mansdorf's experience can serve as a cautionary tale. "Something is wrong when a man in his 80s is worth millions of dollars in 2003 and then in 2006 doesn't have anything to his name, is living off his World War II pension and looking for 99-cent tacos," he said. "If there's that much change in wealth, there has to be a reason for it."
|
|
| |
1 Down and more to come said... February 20, 2012 @ 7:59:15 PM EST
|
|
| |
Google us for details
Cantil, CA
51 min ago American Land Trust Inc Facebook Page/Stan Krol Land speculators see silver lining in solar projects
Remote, inhospitable desert land gains new value as developers seek sites for renewable energy. Industry observers caution that not every owner is going to make a fortune.
Graphic: Land ownership in the Mojave Desert Region
Problems cast shadows of doubt on solar project
Wind power blowing up in California
New DOE maps show wind energy potential in U.S.
Julie Cart, Los Angeles Times
February 18, 2012
Reporting from Ripley, Calif.— For Sale: 3,400 acres in the desert.
• No paved roads. Check.
• Isolated. Ideal.
• Land not suitable for farming. Perfect.
• Blistering sunshine. Jackpot.
• Asking price:$34 million. Deal.
As large-scale solar development has spooled out into Southwestern deserts, the modern-day gold rush is about more than renewable energy. Solar companies and land speculators are gobbling up scarce private land in the California deserts, driving prices up 10- to 20-fold, or even higher.
Desolate acreage that a few years ago might have sold for less than $500 an acre can now fetch as much as $20,000 an acre, according to land brokers in the region. Farmers are also getting in on the action. Alfalfa and cotton fields are being converted to solar and wind farms as the industry's big players put together mega-deals.
"It's mind-boggling what's happening," said Jean Laborde of Bakersfield, a former farmer who has been selling agricultural land in the Mojave and adjacent Colorado deserts for 45 years.
Laborde has made a killing lately. About 10 years ago, one of his clients listed 750 barren acres near the town of Mojave, but Laborde couldn't sell it. He finally bought the land himself for $350 an acre. "There's no water, the wind blows all the time," he said. "Everyone said this was a Godforsaken place."
Laborde held on to the property, then sold it a few years ago to someone who intended to build a solar power plant. Laborde won't disclose what the developer paid, but the price today would be $10,000 an acre, he said. "Turned out to be the best deal I ever made."
Real estate specialists warn that not all desert landowners will enjoy a similar payday, but try telling that to old-timers who hear about deals that have turned farmers into millionaires. A recent example is the family of alfalfa growers in Gila Bend, Ariz., who sold 3,000 acres of cropland to a consortium of investors, who then sold the land to Spanish solar giant Abengoa for $45 million.
Earlier this year Ari Swiller, who heads aLos Angeles-based renewable energy company, quietly gathered up 11,000 acres near Blythe — the largest aggregation of separate parcels the Riverside County assessor's office has seen in 15 years. Although the property hasn't been resold, Riverside County Assessor Larry W. Ward said land in the area that typically sells in "the low hundreds" per acre is now going for $2,000 to $3,000 an acre.
Solar companies are reluctant to speak publicly about land prices, partly out of fear that they will inflame an already overheated market. Developers try to fly beneath the real estate radar, often buying contiguous parcels under different names or through third parties to avoid igniting a land rush.
Most hire brokers or land scouts who bump along dirt roads trolling for cheap land. They, too, operate quietly and seldom disclose whom they represent. Stanley Krol Entrepreneur/American Land Trusts 424-781-5435 |
|
| |
Self-deportation.org said... February 25, 2012 @ 9:23:37 PM EST
|
|
| |
New post on Patriots for Self-Deportation
The New Yorker on Self-Deportation
by Patriots for Self-Deportation
CANDIDATES ON THE BORDER
Posted by William Finnegan
The Republican Presidential campaign has been a bruising race to the bottom on illegal immigration, with seemingly every humane or realistic suggestion provoking a pile-on. Even the mild-mannered Jon Huntsman called Rick Perry “treasonous” for noting that the border with Mexico cannot simply be fenced. Poor Perry: his problem seemed to be a Texan’s familiarity with the actual border—its vastness, its complexity, the billions of dollars it will cost to maintain the hundreds of miles of fence already built (still covering less than a third of the border’s length), and the pointlessness of building more in ever-tougher terrain. Perry’s realism, and the glimmer of compassion he was willing to show—“If you say that we should not educate children who have come into our state for no other reason than they’ve been brought here by no fault of their own, I don’t think you have a heart”—played a significant role in his fall from grace. And so he, too, joined the race to the bottom, seeking the endorsement of America’s most notorious anti-illegal-immigration warrior, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and bringing him out on the campaign trail in Iowa.
Now, with the focus of the campaign shifting to Arpaio’s home state of Arizona, a center of anti-illegal-immigration feeling, the issue’s bound to resurface. It seems to unhinge some politicians. Remember Herman Cain’s electrified border fence? It was going to be twenty feet high, with barbed wire on top and enough voltage to kill a human being. Cain later said he was joking. Actually, a lot of the Republican Presidential contenders’ proposals on the issue would be funny if they weren’t so bizarre or disturbing or both. When Mitt Romney was asked how he would handle illegal immigrants living in the United States, he said, “Well, the answer is self-deportation.” Newt Gingrich has suggested that the deportation question should be decided by neighborhood review boards, which would evaluate the quality of an undocumented individual’s community ties. Rick Santorum, normally second to no straight man in defense of the traditional family, has advocated breaking up families that contain illegal immigrants, as millions of families do. Santorum, belittling Gingrich’s expressed concern for grandmothers who are longtime residents, offered a novel legal theory. “You can’t be here for twenty years and commit only one illegal act,” he told a group in Iowa. “Because everything you’re doing while you’re here is against the law.” (If you can’t get your mind around that concept, you’re in good company. Lacking residence papers is a civil violation, not a crime.) Everyone in the field condemned Perry for making a college education too accessible to undocumented young people in his state—he was “soft on immigration.” Perry retaliated with charges that Romney had made health care too accessible to illegal immigrants in Massachusetts.
And that fence: a mighty one, even if not electrified, has become a must. Will Romney build one the entire length of the border? Yes? Then Gingrich will build two.
Gentlemen, are these Christian sentiments? Do they even attract votes? According to Gallup, a substantial majority of Americans favor, even in this time of high unemployment, a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants—what Romney and company deride as “amnesty” at every turn. The hot pursuit of the Republican primary “base” can carry a man not only many miles from the political center but also far from the teachings, certainly on the subject of immigration, of his own church.
Going that far can also carry a man, such as Romney, into the realm of self-parody. His self-deportation idea is both deadly serious and an old joke. The phrase was apparently coined in 1994 by two Chicano satirists, Lalo Alcaraz and Esteban Zul, for the purpose of mocking an anti-immigrant California ballot initiative. Alcaraz played, brilliantly, a “militant self-deportationist” and right-wing Latino called Daniel D. Portado, and he stayed in character even while being interviewed on TV. A new group, Patriots for Self-Deportation, recently launched a Web site urging Americans to investigate their family trees for illegal immigrants and “anchor babies” and then, if they find anything suspicious, to do the right thing and self-deport. The site is now filling up with anguished testimonials from conscience-stricken young white people heading off to Italy and Poland to atone for their ancestors’ misdeeds. (Portado has sent the new self-deporters a hotly worded cease-and-desist letter.) Meanwhile, irony-free anti-immigrant groups are also laying claim to the phrase, defining it as a synonym for “attrition through enforcement,” which is the strategy behind harsh new laws in Alabama and, yes, Arizona. The aim of those laws is to make life so difficult for illegal immigrants that they will pull up stakes and leave. And that is precisely what Romney meant. His chief adviser on immigration issues, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, was the draft author of both the Arizona and the Alabama laws.
Romney has already gone too far for some of his supporters. Jacob Montijilo Monty, a Houston attorney and Latino Republican activist, wrote a searing column for the Las Vegas Sun last Friday. Monty, once a donor to Romney’s campaign, accused the candidate of “heckl[ing] Hispanics with nativist rhetoric.” Romney’s enthusiasm for self-deportation had been the last straw.
Exactly what kind of conditions would be required before tens of millions of undocumented persons would agree to ‘self-deport’? How hostile would the cultural climate have to be for millions of men, women and children to flee from it? And what about the rest of us, governor? What about my children, who are as proud of their American citizenship, history and heritage as your five fine sons? Would they be forced to grow up in the environment of hateful suspicion that ‘self-deportation’ would require? Like a battered spouse who stays silent in the vain hope that things will somehow change, I made excuses for Romney, crossed my fingers and, until now, kept my lips sealed—and among other Hispanic Republicans, I’ve not been alone. No mas. I want to file charges.
This sort of disaffection could doom a candidate in the general election. Latinos are both the largest and the fastest-growing minority in the country, and their vote will be crucial in several battleground states. Jeb Bush, who knows something himself about persuading Latinos to vote Republican—he won a majority of Latino votes in Florida in 2002—wrote recently, in the Washington Post, “In the fifteen states that are likely to decide who controls the White House and the Senate in 2013, Hispanic voters will represent the margin of victory.” Romney, or whoever wins the Republican nomination, probably plans, per tradition, to tack back toward the political center on a range of issues, including immigration, during the general-election campaign. That may not work, however, on this issue, with these voters. Politically liberal or conservative, people know when they have been scapegoated and insulted. Barack Obama has not delivered on his campaign promise to push hard for comprehensive immigration reform, even after Latinos helped lift him to victory in 2008. But at least everyone knows he was kidding when he talked about putting moats full of alligators on our southern border. Selfdeportation.org/admin-Stan Krol CIO
|
|
| |
2 more wins said... February 29, 2012 @ 2:22:02 AM EST
|
|
| |
..Romney wins pivotal Michigan primary as well as Arizona
.
.By Rachel Rose Hartman
Political Reporter
.PostsEmailRSS .By Rachel Rose Hartman | The Ticket – 5 hrs ago....Email
Share11Print.....
DEARBORN, Mich.--Mitt Romney secured an important win Tuesday night over Rick Santorum in Michigan, in addition to handily winning Arizona one week before Super Tuesday.
"We didn't win by a lot, but we won by enough, and that's all that counts," Romney told a crowd gathered at his victory party in Novi, Mich.
In Michigan, Romney held a 3 percent lead--41 percent to 38 percent over Rick Santorum--with 99 percent of precincts reporting. Ron Paul received 12 percent of the vote and Newt Gingrich received 7 percent. In Arizona, with 90 percent of precincts reporting, Romney led with 47 percent, Santorum was in second with 27 percent, Gingrich third with 16 percent and Paul fourth with 8 percent.
A loss for Romney in Michigan--where he was born and raised and where his father served as governor--would have virtually guaranteed a protracted primary season.
Despite earlier polls showing Santorum besting Romney in Michigan, Romney and his surrogates raised expectations in the state, and this week, the most recent polls out of Michigan showed Romney edging back up to tie Santorum.
After his win, Romney sounded like a general election candidate , attacking President Obama on the economy, jobs, and energy among other issues, and avoiding all mention of his Republican competitors.
"I stand ready to lead our party to victory and our nation back prosperity," Romney said.
In an optimistic speech during which several news networks declared Romney the winner of Michigan, Santorum said, "A month ago they didn't know who we are, but they do now."
News outlets reported that Santorum called Romney to concede prior to his speech, although Santorum did not address the vote totals or his opponent directly during his address. Santorum used much of his speech, delivered at a primary rally in Grand Rapids, Mich., to reinforce his fiscally conservative platform and to laud his 93-year-old grandmother who received a graduate degree as a nurse, worked full time and "taught me how to balance family." He segued into making an appeal to women, particularly working women, perhaps a sign of Santorum's strategy moving into the Super Tuesday contests on Mar. 6.
All Michigan voters were permitted to participate in Tuesday's primary. One in 10 Republican primary voters in Michigan were Democrats, according to preliminary exit poll data. More than half of Michigan voters cited the economy as the most important issue driving their vote.
Because Arizona's 29 delegates are awarded on a winner-take-all basis, Romney received a sizeable delegate boost from the state, which he carried easily as expected.
Michigan will award its 30 delegates on a mostly proportional basis.
Ron Paul campaigned in Michigan, but he did not hold any events there on Tuesday. He held a primary night celebration in Virginia, where he spoke to supporters before the poll closings. Gingrich all but ignored Michigan in favor of the Super Tuesday contests and additional upcoming voting states. He spent Tuesday night in Georgia.
More popular Yahoo! News stories:
|
|
| |
Iara said... March 01, 2012 @ 10:53:18 AM EST
|
|
| |
Good cmmoent yes, I was thinking about the Hippocratic oath and they do say the oath the modern one is this (Remember how old Ron Paul is) and obviously you haven't heard the same interviews with Paul as I have. He wants the federal government to control the sales of pot, cocaine, heroin like they do the other legal drugs. I swear to fulfill, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant: I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow.I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism.I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon's knife or the chemist's drug.I will not be ashamed to say I know not , nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient's recovery.I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given to me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person's family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems, if I am to care adequately for the sick.I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.I will remember that I remain a member of society with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm.If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.Don't you think a good fence will be part of a solution? Enjoyed to talking to you all, will pick it up tomorrow. Got dishes to do I like this crowd better than most of the blogspots. Intelligent , thought provoking conversation we conservatives need to vet our candidates , we need to discuss and get on the same page eventually for the good of the country. I have worked on many a campaign and have been an elected official myself. Come from a line of political office holders , believe it or not, Democrat. That was back when Dems were not that much different than Repubs. Labels blow off going up and burn off going down whether they are religious ones or political ones. I am a Christian Conservative like Sarah Palin like Rick Perry .like Rick Santorum like Michelle Bachman speaking of such, did you hear her say that we need to keep giving aide to countries that are burning our flag on Cavuto today? Do what? I like Rick's stand start with zero with every dang country and if they are allies, help them if not, fergitaboutit .We will talk again soon, I hope So far in an unofficial poll of Flopping Aces we have 1 vote for Perry, 1 vote for Paul, and 1 vote for Ivan (he votes for himself)Reply |
|
| |
Betty said... March 02, 2012 @ 11:38:20 PM EST
|
|
| |
That's funny, I've noticed just the pisoopte, the anti-Paul posters are the first to resort to grade school name calling, pretty much like the liberals do, then there's the old they're all anarchists line if they don't want social con imposed statism. The only difference between the social cons and the neo socs is the vision of utopia they want to use the federal government to enforce.Frankly, hypocrisy doesn't concern me, what concerns me is that people are willing to give Newt a pass on supporting TARP, supporting the forced mandate on insurance, supporting gorebull warming, and supporting amnesty (I guess his plan to execute those with 2 oz of pot made up for all of that). Yet everybody calls Paul crazy and pretty much the only thing I've seen sited as proof is his opinion about why the islamofacists attacked us.I completely agree, the fact that we had troops in the middle east was not the reason for the attacks, but it certainly helped the enemy's recruiting of people and resources. To say that swimming in a crocodile infested river did contribute to getting your but bit by a crock. . . is a crock.While his reasoning is flawed, naive, and overly simple, so is the reasoning of those who say they attacked because their jealous of our way of life etc., etc. No war was ever fought by a force in which each individual was fighting for the same reason (IMHO). Some of the muzzis fight us because we're there, some because they are jealous, some because of their mythology, some to make a buck, some to avenge a real or perceived slight.But, overall, the visceral, negative responses I see to Paul, the one guy who (hypocritically or not) has at least been consistent in calling for smaller, Constitutional government is disheartening. He could not in the span of a century bring enough pork to his district to equal the damage done by the policies Newt has at least tacitly supported.Interesting.Reply |
|
| |
Archie to Betty said... March 03, 2012 @ 4:34:46 PM EST
|
|
| |
Nice point your making, where are pastign these stories from???.Reply |
|
| |
Archie to Betty said... March 03, 2012 @ 4:38:10 PM EST
|
|
| |
Nice point your making, where are pastign these stories from???.Reply |
|
| |
paste this and send said... March 03, 2012 @ 4:46:27 PM EST
|
|
| |
Copy,Paste and Forward this message to blogs,social media and your Family and Friends. A growing force within the Tea Party and beyond, Patriots for Self-Deportation.org believe that securing our borders is not enough. We must make sure that all residents and “citizens” have a true right to be in this great land. We believe our current laws must be changed to abolish anchor babies, whose children, throughout history, should have never received automatic citizenship to this nation. If the Federal government will not take action NOW, then it is up to us, WE THE PEOPLE, to put an end to the invasion and internal decay that threatens to destroy the fabric of the USA. |
|
| |
November is coming said... March 03, 2012 @ 6:19:55 PM EST
|
|
| |
By Guest Blogger on Mar 3, 2012 at 3:23 pm
Our guest bloggers are Angela Maria Kelley, Vice President for Immigration Policy and Advocacy, and Philip E. Wolgin, Immigration Policy Analyst, at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
After Mitt Romney’s easy win in Tuesday’s Arizona Republican primary, a number of commentators pointed to the fact that immigration just did not seem to be a big issue in the state. So does Romney’s win mean that immigration is fading as an important issue on the campaign?
Not at all. Arizona was a closed Republican primary, and when it comes down to it, all of the Republican candidates have taken a harsh stand on immigration. The real contest, however, is down the road in November.
In advance of Super Tuesday, we review Romney’s immigration positions, and explain why his policies will imperil his candidacy with Latino voters across the country.
Romney’s Views Are Still Outside of the Mainstream
Mitt Romney has taking an ever increasing hard-line on immigration, telling audiences nationwide that he would veto the DREAM Act, and most recently calling Arizona’s anti-immigration law, S.B. 1070, a “model” for the rest of the nation. He enthusiastically touted the endorsement of nativist attorney Kris Kobach, and most recently accepted the endorsement of Arizona’s Governor, Jan Brewer, who signed S.B. 1070 into law nearly two years ago and has defended the draconian law every step of the way.
But even as he cruised to victory in Arizona, Romney’s tough immigration positions did not resonate with Latinos in the state. In a Public Policy Polling poll released a week before the Arizona primary, Mitt Romney had only a 27 percent favorable rating with Hispanics, and a 66 percent unfavorable rating. Nationwide, 74 percent of Latino voters oppose or strongly oppose Arizona’s S.B. 1070, the model of self-deportation that Romney and Kobach want to make a national policy.
And these negative views are not confined to voters in Arizona. The most recent Latino Decisions poll of Latinos nationwide, released on January 25, found that most Latinos saw immigration reform and the DREAM Act as the most important issue facing their community that Congress and the President should tackle, with fixing the economy coming in a close second. Overwhelmingly, voters stated that if the election were held today, they would vote for Barack Obama 67 percent to 25 percent over Mitt Romney. Likewise when asked about their views on what the government’s policy toward undocumented immigrants should be, 71 percent chose a program of earned citizenship, while only 11 percent thought that the government should make all undocumented immigrants felons.
Most importantly, the issue of immigration is deeply personal to Latinos – 53 percent know someone who is undocumented, and a full one-quarter of Latino voters know a person facing deportation or who has been deported.
The general public as well has time and time again supported a balanced approach to immigration, with increased border security on the one hand, and a pathway to earned legalization on the other, rather than simply making life more and more difficult for unauthorized immigrants.
Self-Deportation is a Myth
Among the centerpieces of Romney’s immigration policies is the idea of self-deportation, or that if individual states and the government as a whole make life as difficult as possible for immigrants, then they will choose to leave the country on their own. Romney touts this plan as the better alternative to sending Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers after each and every one of the 11 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the country.
But take a closer look at the idea of self-deportation, and the facts just do not add up. As our recent report “Staying Put but Still in the Shadows” illustrates, unauthorized immigrants are not leaving the country even in the face of harsh anti-immigrant laws. They choose to stay in the U.S. regardless of what the government tries to do to them because most have been here for more than 10 years and live in families, they understand the risks associated with making the return trip, and they know that if the job market conditions are bad in the United States, they are even worse in their home countries.
Worse still, even while state and local anti-immigrant laws fail to achieve their self-deportation goals, they wreak havoc on the communities in which they are implemented. Arizona’s S.B. 1070 cost that state over $141 million in conference cancellations alone, while Alabama’s law, H.B. 56, could cost that state up to $11 billion in lost economic value not to mention the disruptions caused to everyday life as immigrants and Latinos in the state live in fear of being stopped on the street.
Conclusion
Whether or not Republican voters continue to vote for Mitt Romney, or whether they shift toward the other candidates such as Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich in the primaries, the ever increasing hard-right turn of Romney, and the continued talk of “self-deportation” is only further alienating Latino voters, as well as mainstream Americans. The Kobach-line on immigration might play well today, but the real contest is to come in November.
Tags:ImmigrationMitt Romney |
|
| |
Super Tuesday Final results said... March 07, 2012 @ 2:53:07 AM EST
|
|
| |
.
Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends
Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.
..
Login with Facebook.
.
.
..
.
.
.
..
....
.
.
Romney wins Alaska, his 6th Super Tuesday victory
By LAURIE KELLMAN | Associated Press – 9 mins ago...
.
Email
Print
... .
.
.
Related Content.
.
.Enlarge Photo.
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney addresses …
.Enlarge Photo.
Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum speaks …
...
..
.
Politics slideshows.
.
Scenes from Super Tuesday
30 photos - 1 hr 37 mins ago
Romney clinches Ohio primary
15 photos - 4 hrs ago
Santorum in tight GOP race
25 photos - Mon, Feb 13, 2012
...
See latest photos »..
.
.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Mitt Romney is adding one more victory to his Super Tuesday showing — the Alaska caucuses.
Ron Paul came in second in Alaska, finishing the 10-state Super Tuesday without a single victory.
Romney won Ohio's Republican presidential primary, narrowly defeating Rick Santorum in the most critical and hard-fought of the Super Tuesday contests.
In all, Romney has gained victories in six Super Tuesday states. The other states he's won are Massachusetts, Vermont, Virginia and Idaho.
Santorum has won Tennessee, Oklahoma and North Dakota, while Newt Gingrich has won his home state of Georgia.
|
|
| |
rwkermn said... March 09, 2012 @ 5:18:59 PM EST
|
|
| |
2YPXHH , [url=http://kseknnzexmym.com/]kseknnzexmym[/url], [link=http://zqhaosjovgsx.com/]zqhaosjovgsx[/link], http://wivqvrarzsbz.com/ |
|
| |
Text JBMtrust to 1-561-TEXTED-ME said... March 09, 2012 @ 9:50:51 PM EST
|
|
| |
Malibu Oceanfront Investing said...
March 09, 2012 @ 9:42:33 PM EST
Real Estate News & Commentary by Stan Krol Entrepreneur, March 9th, 2012. Foreclosures reached a high in February, the last month data was available, when 4,169 high–end homes were somewhere in the foreclosure process; having received a foreclosure notice, had an auction scheduled or had ownership taken over by the lender. That’s a 121% increase from a year ago. The deterioration comes just as housing experts say that foreclosures in the low and middle ends of the housing market are showing signs of stabilization. Heated pools, ocean views and media rooms are not what most people would expect to find in a foreclosed property, but more high–end homes – priced at more than a million dollars – have been falling into the hands of banks this year. Foreclosures of homes worth more than $1 million began increasing at the end of 2011, according to data provided to CNBC.com by foreclosure tracking website RealtyTrac. Owners of expensive homes "were able to stave off foreclosure longer," says independent real estate analyst Jack McCabe, CEO of McCabe Research and Consulting in South Florida. "Lower–end homeowners were the first ones to see the escalating foreclosures, because they generally do not have the cash reserves or credit available that the luxury homeowners do." They had the ability to take their credit cards and pull out thousands of dollars, while the lower–end buyers were already tapped out. Data show that may be the case around the country. The 90–day delinquency rate on home loans worth more than a million dollars hit a high in February at 13.3%, above the overall rate of 8.6%, according to real estate data firm First American CoreLogic. Foreclosure proceedings generally start after a homeowner has been at least 90 days late on a mortgage payment, experts say. One difference in the high–end market is that lenders are willing to do more to head off foreclosure by renegotiating the loan or accepting a short-sale transaction, which is essentially a last–ditch effort. "Lenders are far more likely to go the short–sale route," says Andrew LePage, an analyst at real estate research firm DataQuick. "There’s a lot more money at stake, and maintenance can be high if a foreclosure just sits there." A $1.15 million condominium in Chicago in the landmark Palmolive Building was initially offered as a short sale, but after a buyer did not materialize, it’s now owned by the bank, says Janice Corley, founder of Sudler Sotheby’s International Realty, which is currently listing it. The condo has lake views and a long list of luxury–building amenities, including a steam room, doorman and gym. . The rise in luxury foreclosures has one Las Vegas real estate agent flying prospective buyers into the city via private jet. Luxury Homes of Las Vegas and JetSuite Air teamed to offer the complimentary trip for buyers flying from Los Angeles to view three foreclosed homes priced between $4.9 million and $6.1 million Agent Ken Lowman says he gave three tours over a one–week period and hopes to expand the offer to buyers from other West Coast cities. There’s just too much competition, Lowman says. "It takes an innovative approach like this to get results." ========================================= What does this mean for you? You need to get heavily involved in investing in Foreclosed properties. The competition within our industry is getting more and more powerful, but with the right information, knowledge and connections, you can leave your competition behind! Position yourself as a leader in your niche and/or territory, build credibility and business will follow you and increase slowly but surely. I would recommend you attend my Wealth Building Conference taking place in Los Angeles(Woodland Hills) CA. Register Now! Remember, only winners will rise to the top! I'll help you better position you as the real estate expert you need to be in today’s market. Click here to reserve your spot today. I’d like to introduce you to a little-known way to do business that has made me millions and has created dozens of “stay at home” real estate entrepreneurs who make comfortable incomes, some as much as 6 or 7-figures. To your success! Stanley Krol Entrepreneur
|
|
| |
mhubjh said... March 11, 2012 @ 5:40:04 AM EST
|
|
| |
GG6p45 zpabxyduxnrq |
|
| |
Lorren said... March 13, 2012 @ 11:35:44 PM EST
|
|
| |
Hazel thanks for your note. (LOVE The Sartorialist!!). All black is often the default colour because it's the easier to unify (imagine an ensemble full of slightly different shades of red), it's easy on the eyes, and the audience tends to focus more on the music than if the ensemble were wearing different colours. The problem with saying go for it, wear any colour is what one person considers stylish another will consider completely inappropriate. There there's the issue of colour clashing. And in classical music, there are known stereotypes about what kind of dress is associated with certain types of music. Opera performers (and audiences) tend to go all out with style and flamboyance; Baroque performers (and audiences) tend not to consider fashion a big deal and are very low-key with their apparel. Ultimately, no, I don't think ensembles should be able to wear any colour; then it looks like a rehearsal.
free car insurance quotes car insurance rates |
|
| |
..... said... March 18, 2012 @ 6:15:11 PM EST
|
|
| |
Alan Casden will not be the next owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, as he had his ownership bid rejected by Major League Baseball.
Casden, a Beverly Hills real estate developer, was not invited to Monday’s meetings between Dodgers bidders and two committees of major league owners.
The six bidding groups at the meetings: hedge-fund billionaire Steven Cohen and longtime agent Arn Tellem; St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke; Memphis Grizzlies owner Michael Heisley and Los Angeles investor Tony Ressler; Los Angeles civic leader and investor Stanley Gold; New York media executive Leo Hindery; and veteran baseball executive Stan Kasten and Guggenheim Partners Chief Executive Mark Walter. Magic Johnson, who is a partner with Kasten and Guggenheim, was unable to attend because of a scheduling conflict.
So it’s down to six, but three clear favorites have emerged.
Cohen is widely considered one of three favorites to buy the team, along with St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke and a group led by Magic Johnson and veteran baseball executive Stan Kasten.
Steven Cohen appears to clearly be in the lead, but why?
There are several bidders offering $1.5 billion for the Dodgers. But who has the cash? Remember when Rick Caruso bailed? That wasn’t about the parking lots not being included, as Caruso so meekly claimed (how many teams own their own parking lots?). It was about Caruso not having the cash. MLB kicked out Jared Kushner because he didn’t have the cash either. He wanted to buy the Dodgers with too much debt. Been there, done that.
As expected, all of this comes down to money. Not so much total money bid, but who can give Frank McCourt the most money right now. As such, it appears that the three with the most are Cohen, Stan Kroenke, and Magic Johnson/Stan Kasten.
—–
Now I was going to write about the ownership situation in further detail, but Mike Petriello has already said a lot of the things I wanted to say.
I’ve been pretty apprehensive about Cohen since the first time we talked about him, arguing that a hedge fund guy under investigation from the SEC who’s had his own nightmare divorce which stretched over two decades isn’t exactly the ideal owner to follow up Frank McCourt. Besides, while it doesn’t bother me so much, I know the idea of another East Coast import (a Mets fan and recent buyer of a minority share in the club, Cohen currently lives in Connecticut) who has reportedly never even been to Dodger Stadium won’t sit well with any of us.
Yup. Do not want.
Then there’s Kroenke, who has some appeal. He’s clearly got a ton of experience in sports ownership, having owned parts or all of the St. Louis Rams, English soccer club Arsenal, and basically every professional Colorado sports club that isn’t the Rockies or Broncos, including the Nuggets (NBA), Avalanche (NHL), Mammoth (NLL), Rapids (MLS), and Crush (AFL). Beyond the teams themselves, his groups own the Pepsi Center in Denver and launched Altitude (a regional sports network which carries his Colorado teams) & TicketHorse, a ticketing agency for all of his teams.
He wrote a lot more on Kroenke, including finding an article from 2010 which talks about Kroenke’s management style, most of which paints him in a positive light.
Of course, the primary worry with him is that the Dodgers might be secondary to getting an NFL team in Los Angeles, as I mentioned previously.
—–
So basically, Magic Johnson’s group is still my favorite, but I’m starting to realize that Stan Kroenke brings a ton to the table as well. The worry is Steven Cohen because of a few black marks on his personal record, because I’m not convinced he’s actually interested in the team, and because he resembles Dr. Evil from “Austin Powers“.
|
|
| |
Mitts getting there said... March 21, 2012 @ 9:55:18 AM EST
|
|
| |
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney waves to a crowd in Schaumburg, Ill., after winning the Illinois Republican presidential primary, Tuesday, March 20, 2012. / AP
Written by
| Associated Press
Filed Under
News
Nation/World
SCHAUMBURG, ILL. — Mitt Romney took a major stride toward the Republican presidential nomination Tuesday night, routing Rick Santorum in the Illinois primary for his third-straight big-state win and padding his already-formidable lead in the race for convention delegates.
“What a night,” Romney exulted to cheering supporters in suburban Chicago. Looking beyond his GOP rivals, he said he had a simple message for President Barack Obama, the man Republicans hope to defeat next fall: “Enough. We’ve had enough.”
Returns from 61 percent of Illinois’ precincts showed Romney gaining 48 percent of the vote compared to 34 percent for Santorum, 9 percent for Ron Paul and 8 percent for a fading Newt Gingrich.
That was a far more substantial showing for Romney than the grudging victories he eked out in the previous few weeks in Michigan and Ohio, primaries that did as much to raise questions about his ability to attract Republican support as to quell those questions.
Santorum, who hopes to rebound in next Saturday’s Louisiana primary, sounded like anything but a defeated contender as he spoke to supporters in Gettysburg, Pa. He said he had outpolled Romney in downstate Illinois and the areas “that conservatives and Republicans populate. We’re very happy about that and we’re happy about the delegates we’re going to get, too.”
“Saddle up, like (Ronald) Reagan did in the cowboy movies,” he urged his backers.
Romney triumphed in Illinois after benefitting from a crushing, 7-1 advantage in the television advertising wars, and as his chief rival struggled to overcome self-imposed political wounds in the marathon race to pick an opponent to Obama.
Most recently, Santorum backpedaled after saying on Monday that the economy wasn’t the main issue of the campaign. “Occasionally you say some things where you wish you had a do-over,” he said later.
Over the weekend, he was humbled in the Puerto Rico primary after saying that to qualify for statehood the island commonwealth should adopt English as an official language.
|
|
| |
Romney for President Event said... March 24, 2012 @ 8:28:05 PM EST
|
|
| |
Palm Springs Stay & Free Lift Putter annual Event Promo said...
March 24, 2012 @ 8:31:07 PM EST
Worldmark Palm Springs Resort, CA. Custom Booking: You choose how many nights you would like to stay in a 2 bedroom resort (Sun-Thurs ONLY & no holidays). Please check room availability by sending me a question with the dates you would like to stay. Once I confirm availability, you may proceed to make the purchase. *Note: Each quantity is per a night stay. ie: purchasing two means paying for a two night stay. Two Bedroom: King in master, queen in second bedroom, queen murphy bed in living area. 1 3/4 bathrooms. (comfortably sleeps 6) AND with fully equipped kitchen, air-conditioning, and small deck or balcony. **Please keep in mind that the price in this auction is all you have to pay for the resort, nothing more. Check out the pictures: https://www.worldmarktheclub.com/resorts/ps/ This is a Wyndham Vacation Resorts property. Check-in is 4pm; check-out is 10am. Must be 21 years of age to check in. Credit card required at checkin as security (Note: your credit card will not be charged). Check In Address: 1177 N Palm Canyon Dr Palm Springs, CA 92262 Unit Amenities · High-speed Internet access (fee applicable) · Air conditioning · Cable TV · DVD player · Stereo with CD · Telephone · Gas fireplace · Balcony/terrace (some shared) · Gas barbecue · Murphy bed · Washer and dryer or laundry facilities · Iron and ironing board · Hairdryers Resort Amenities · Outdoor swimming pool · Outdoor children’s pool · Outdoor spa · Fitness center · Pool table · Ping-Pong · Arcade games · Shared computer with Internet Local Activities · More than 120 golf courses · Tennis · Biking · Art galleries · Aerial tramway to an elevation of 8,516 feet · Moorten's Botanical Garden · Knott's Soak City USA (March-October) · Hot air balloon rides · Joshua Tree National Park · Jeep eco tours · Palm Canyon Theatre · Spa/Resort casino (just six blocks from your resort) Airports · Palm Springs (PSP) 3 mi · San Bernardino (SBD) 51 mi · Ontario (ONT) 67 mi · Long Beach (LGB) 108 mi There is a resort directory in each unit with special instructions and a lot of helpful information. Phone numbers, resort activities, area activities, local restaurants, etc. The winning bid is all you pay the seller. You need to have a major credit card to check in, but nothing will be charged to it unless you make long distance calls or charge something to your room. All Sales Are Final! No Cancellations! NO ownership tour or sales presentation is required during this stay. When the Lift Putters LLC charity auction is complete and payment is received, I will call Wyndham and have the reservation put in your name and a reservation confirmation will be sent to you. If you have any other questions, I would be glad to help in any way I can. Please note: I also have other vacation rentals available. If you do not see what you are looking for there, please contact me and I will try to book exactly what you want and list it on ebay. Here is a link to other resort properties I have: https://www.worldmarktheclub.com/resorts/ The following is disclosure required by Timeshare Sellers info website: "By listing this auction I verify that I am the actual travel agent or travel provider and not a third party affiliate. The travel/accommodations in this auction will be booked directly through me and not an outside agency. I also verify that, other than the government taxes and related government fees stated within the listing description itself, there will be absolutely no additional fees, charges or after auction purchases associated with booking the travel within this listing." Stanley "Stan Krol" CEO 424-781-5435 24hrs!
|
|
| |
Tibbie said... March 31, 2012 @ 11:37:36 PM EST
|
|
| |
everything is fair, then suddenly anyone without a view the Right approves of is unAmerican? It is the diversity of our views and our right to have them that makes American in the first place. If the United States wanted to go in the direction of policies you dont favor, as a majority, as long as minority rights are respected, as they are in a Republic, then that is what America is about ultimately going in the direction it wants to go, and if it wants to go in your direction, fine, if most agree–it is the toleration that is key to being an American, so I wont ask the obvious question of you.You really think there is equity already? Then why do we have these problems? All the jobs are filled, people want to work, we cant grow the economy without spending but jobs go abroad or for low wage hear, while many want to throw out the tomato and strawberry pickers but wont do that work themselves, and I guess are expecting…me?The playing field is not level. Here are some ways to make it so:– TERM LIMITS NEXT TERM –– RESTORE WARTIME DRAFT –– MONEY OUT FEDERAL ELECTIONS –– RELOCATE BASES TO SEAL SOUTHERN BORDER –– Convene Constitutional Convention Now –– Personal Liability Waivers (Obamacare, TSA pat downs using non-TSA personnel in other airlines with people that agree with you; dont want to wear a helmet or fasten your seatbelt? Have a sticker on your license plate that you have health insurance so fixing your brain will not cost someone else)
nexium viagra |
|
| |
hash tag askmitt said... April 01, 2012 @ 5:32:02 PM EST
|
|
| |
News
Mitt Romney holds Google+ Hangout
Tuesday's is first in series of Hangouts with GOP presidential candidates
By Sharon Gaudin
March 20, 2012 02:59 PM ET3 Comments.Computerworld - Just as voters in Illinois are heading to the polls to cast their votes in the Republican primary today, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is participating in a Google+ hangout.
Dubbing the event "Hang out with Mitt," the live-streaming discussion is being held on Romney's Google+ page and on YouTube.
According to Steve Grove, head of Community Partnerships with Google+, this is the first in a series of Hangouts that will include all of the GOP presidential hopefuls.
"In American politics, there's nothing quite so frantic or fast-paced as a presidential campaign," wrote Grove in a blog post. "Short campaign stops and relentless travel schedules can make it difficult for candidates to sit down with supporters and discuss the issues. Google+ Hangouts have made that a little bit easier, providing new ways for politicians, political organizations, advocates and campaigners to connect directly over video to share information online."
Google+ users can pose their questions by using the #AskMitt hash tag on the social network.
The Republicans aren't the first to come up with the idea.
In January, President Barack Obama participated in a Google+ Hangout, following his State of the Union address
|
|
| |
Being Tough said... April 03, 2012 @ 2:47:39 AM EST
|
|
| |
..
Mormon Question Sparks Tense Moment During Mitt Romney Town Hall
By Emily Friedman | ABC News – 12 hrs ago...
.
Email
1
Print
... .
.
.
HOWARD, Wis. - A tense moment transpired during a town hall hosted by Mitt Romney today in Wisconsin when an audience member began reading verses from the Book of Mormon and questioned Romney on his stance on interracial relationships.
When a man's hand shot up in the air to ask a question, Romney seemed to take note that he was holding papers, typically a sign that the questioner has a long-winded question they've chosen to write out, and as the man began to speak remarked, "I know where this is going. Ha. Ha. Ha."
"Your Mormon faith might not be a concern in the election but I think it might be as well as I found these verses in the Mormon book," said 28-year-old Bret Hatch, as the microphone turned on.
As Hatch trialed off, Romney interjected: "Why don't you give me a question?"
"Ok, well, in the Mormon book it says there were a blackness came upon all the children of Canaan that they were despised," Hatch continued.
"I'm sorry we're just not going to have a discussion about religion in my view, but if you have a question, I'll be happy to answer your question," Romney said.
"I guess my question is do you believe it's a sin for a white man to marry and procreate with a black?" asked Hatch.
"No," Romney responded sternly, before turning to face the other side of the room.
"Next question," said Romney.
While Romney shot down the discussion of religion at the time, just moments later when asked how he'd respond to being characterized as "out of touch," Romney volunteered a story about the time he served as a pastor for his church.
"I've had an unusual experience," said Romney. "This gentleman wanted to talk about the doctrines of my religion. I'll talk about the practices of my faith. I had the occasion in my church to be asked to be the pastor, if you will, of a congregation. And I've served in that kind of role for about 10 years. And that gave me the occasion to work with people on a very personal basis that were dealing with unemployment, with marital difficulties, with health difficulties of their own and with their kids." "People have burdens in this country, and when you get a chance to know people on a very personal basis, whether you're serving as a pastor or perhaps as a counselor or in other kinds of roles, you understand that every kind of person you see is facing some challenges. And one of the reasons I'm running for president of the United States is I want to help people, I want to lighten that burden," he said.
Hatch later told reporters that he is a Ron Paul supporter and had come to the Romney event to find out if the candidate believed in the Book of Mormon. "Either he believes the Book of Mormon, or he doesn't," he said. "That's what it comes down to. So either he believes it, and he believes what these things say right here, or he doesn't. And from what I understand he just denounced his faith up there."
"I think that's an important issue," said Hatch. "He's going up against a black guy! He's going against Obama. This is a racial issue."
Also Read...
.
@yahoonews on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook |
|
| |
Kaylea said... April 06, 2012 @ 2:14:05 AM EST
|
|
| |
. I totally agree. Indeed when you chase down those stories from the provided links you find “excerpts”, out of context “sound bites”, half truths, or just flat out opinion pieces from the likes of Coulter. etc. False witness and distortion indeed.One of the links is to a Buzzfeed video in 1988 about George HW Bush campaign and how Newt felt that Bush needed his own vision, not the vision of Reagan 80, or 84′. He said if Bush runs on a continuation of Reagan he would lose because people will vote for what might be good change, and instead he needed to define his administration from his own views and not Reagans. Of course Drudge has spun that into Gingrich Bashing Reagan circa 1988…. Ridiculous.
auto insurance quotes auto insurance |
|
| |
Earlier anchor babys are ok said... April 07, 2012 @ 1:30:46 PM EST
|
|
| |
After saying he would veto the DREAM Act if elected President and then calling it a handout, GOP Mitt Romney publicly revealed one of his his campaign's worst-kept secrets: that his father was born in Mexico.
(Credit: Jordan Fabian, Univision News)
Sunday in New Hampshire, Univision News, which is quickly becoming one of the better English-language news for the US Latino market, was covering Romney's campaign in Rochester NY (full story here) when the former Massachusetts Governor began talking about his family history. Here is the excerpt:
During a packed rally at the Rochester Opera House, Romney spoke about his family’s history, in particular his father’s rags-to-riches tale. He briefly referenced the fact that his father, George, was born in Mexico and came to the United States at age five.
Despite not graduating college, George Romney went on to become an auto executive, governor of Michigan and a Republican presidential candidate in the 1970s. Romney suggested that his father’s tale is similar to those of immigrants to came to the U.S. who are searching for economic opportunity.
“We became a nation that attracted the innovators of the world,” Romney said, wrapping up his riff. “It’s in our DNA, it’s who we are.”
Today, Univision News' Jordan Fabian followed Romney to another event in Nashua:
After a speech to the Nashua Chamber of Commerce, Romney was asked how he could create more excitement for the Republican Party. In his reply, he unexpectedly brought up the subject of Latino voters.
“I need to get 50.1 percent of the American people behind me,” Romney began. “Take a group like Latino-Americans. If I can convince more Latino-Americans to vote Republican, I’ll be doing pretty well pretty broadly.”
Romney’s comment was an indication that he’s beginning to look ahead to the general election, suggesting that Latinos could be the key swing group in that contest.
All of a sudden Romney is starting to court Latinos? Does he think Latinos have a short memory? What you do you think?
More Rebelde Posts
Jeb Bush Endorses Romney: Will It Matter to US Latino Voters?
The Macondo Effect: Why Mitt Romney's Win in Puerto Rico Means Nothing
DNC Releases Remarks by Reid, Huerta, and González Regarding Romney's Immigration Policy
Rep. Xavier Becerra on Pete Wilson Endorsing Mitt Romney: "Dime con quién andas y te diré quién eres"
Today on @AlPunto and @Univision: Senator Bob Menendez Criticizes Mitt Romney’s Pledge to Veto the DREAM Act
Mitt Romney on the IssuesChaCha Quizzes
Share this:
inShare.1
Categories: Politics
Tags: GOP, Mexican, Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney Mexico, presidential election, Romney Mexican, Univision News |
|
| |
Groupon promo 20-85% off said... April 07, 2012 @ 1:53:15 PM EST
|
|
| |
20-35% Off these client ads/promo code(April15krol) said...
April 07, 2012 @ 1:50:54 PM EST
Expires 4/30/2012 Showing postings posted during 2012 page: 1 2 3 postings 1 - 50 of 131 total Status Manage Posting Posted In Posted Date ID Active Renting Luxury Rooms includes ALL Utilities/Free WiFi/Gym/Heated Pool - $199 orl rooms & shares 2012-04-07 10:47 2945523653 Active 2012 Political Writers for GOP Campaigns - lax write/edit/trans 2012-04-07 10:43 2945516536 Active Marriot Harbour Club w/FREE Golf by Lift Putter LLC/Assets/Jobs & more - $109 hhi vacation rentals 2012-04-07 10:41 2945513479 Active Fishermans Wharf Unit/Suite with Full Kitchen "NOT $239/Rate Nightly" - $98 sfo vacation rentals 2012-04-01 17:21, renewed 2012-04-07 10:41 2935032845 Active Luxury Rooms 2 Bedrooms $35 More Sleeps 6 SEE PICS ********NEAR DISNEY - $49 orl rooms & shares 2012-04-01 17:18, renewed 2012-04-07 10:40 2935026939 Active Timeshares WANTED by Buyers in SF area only! Call NOW! - sfo real estate wanted 2012-03-24 18:07, renewed 2012-04-07 10:40 2920716914 Active Mitt Romney Website Page 1 of Millions! SEO Expert PPC income! - slc business/commercial - by owner 2012-03-29 19:22, renewed 2012-04-07 10:40 2930048169 Active Large Lot of Golf Mallet Lift Putters "INSERT" Head "Balls Out - $595 sdo business/commercial - by owner 2012-04-01 17:07, renewed 2012-04-07 10:40 2935010705 Active Lift Putter LLC offers 5.9 Million Presidential Reserve Platium Points - $2295 nyc sublets & temporary 2012-04-01 17:09, renewed 2012-04-07 10:39 2935013328 Active Flat Desert Land N LA County and Kern 9950 Acres Total! Mostly Private - lax real estate - by broker 2012-04-01 17:10, renewed 2012-04-07 10:39 2935015204 Active DISNEY PACKAGE/FREE GOLF for 7 Island 1 Resorts/Orbit One S-20 Suite! - $1195 chi vacation rentals 2012-04-01 17:05, renewed 2012-04-07 10:39 2935008240 Active Trade your RV Motorhome for this... - $1390000 lax rvs - by owner 2012-04-01 17:04, renewed 2012-04-07 10:39 2935005912 Active Promo Package by Lift Putter for Adults/Las Vegas/Limo/VIP/Clubs &more - $199 lax general for sale - by owner 2012-04-01 17:02, renewed 2012-04-07 10:38 2935003217 Active Developed apps for PPC/Profit Website income ***Page 1 of 256 MILLION! - $58995 sdo business/commercial - by owner 2012-04-07 10:38 2945506102 Active Trade your RV Motorhome for this... - $1390000 lax rvs - by owner 2012-04-07 10:20 2945471729 Active Foreclosures/Lift Putter LLC/ NV ONLY info website and 100 Properties! - $795000 bos office & commercial 2012-04-07 10:19 2945470209 Active Lift Putter LLC offers 5.9 Million Presidential Reserve Platium Points - $2295 nyc sublets & temporary 2012-04-07 10:18 2945468073 Active DISNEY PACKAGE/FREE GOLF for 7 Island 1 Resorts/Orbit One S-20 Suite! - $1195 chi vacation rentals 2012-04-07 10:18 2945467029 Active Promo Package by Lift Putter for Adults/Las Vegas/Limo/VIP/Clubs &more - $199 lax general for sale - by owner 2012-04-07 10:17 2945465583 Active Single Guy seeking Private Room 1-3 Months - $350 lax rooms wanted 2012-03-24 18:15, renewed 2012-04-03 00:03 2920726694 Active Best Offer/Trade 1031? Tax Value is $906,000 owe $303,500. By Owner - lax real estate - by owner 2012-03-24 18:14, renewed 2012-04-03 00:03 2920725153 Active Golf Course Rounds included - $79 lax vacation rentals 2012-03-29 17:59, renewed 2012-04-03 00:03 2929933785 Active Palm Springs "LUXURY" Timeshares for Locals includes Day use/Parking! - $299 psp business/commercial - by owner 2012-03-05 20:35, renewed 2012-04-03 00:03 2886964560 Active Lift Putters Special 27 Holes @ Starr Pass Golf Suites/Sleeps 6....... - $79 tus vacation rentals 2012-03-05 20:17, renewed 2012-04-03 00:02 2886946340 Active Lift Putter Free Golf Special @ Stallion Springs Resort ***BEST OFFER! - $49 bak vacation rentals 2012-03-05 19:56, renewed 2012-04-03 00:02 2886923777 Active BEST OFFERS! Beach Resort Timeshare March-June 2012 Pick dates! - $49 orc vacation rentals 2012-03-05 19:42, renewed 2012-04-03 00:02 2886907194 Active Developed apps for PPC/Profit Website income ***Page 1 of 256 MILLION! - $58995 sdo business/commercial - by owner 2012-03-24 18:05, renewed 2012-04-02 23:29 2920714060 Active $99 Fee appt to Sell/Donate/Rent/Deed Back Timeshare Weeks/Points! - lax real estate services 2012-04-01 18:36 2935141710 Active 1031 IRS Trade or other? Malibu Oceanfront PCH for Vegas Blvd Strip - lvg housing swap 2012-04-01 18:26 2935127863 Active 2 Baths Presidential Resort Sleeps 6 > LIFT PUTTER < Promo 50 Miles/DC - $695 wdc vacation rentals 2012-04-01 18:24 2935124971 Active Waterfront Luxury with Boat Slip from "NOW" till? Stay 2-28 Nights - $65 enc vacation rentals 2012-04-01 18:22 2935121426 Active Rental of Timeshares by Owners/Services include Comp Travel Vacations! - lax travel/vacation 2012-04-01 18:18 2935116145 Active Malibu Land Owner Since 1997 Selling/Trading/Diesel Pushers? - $599000 lvg real estate - by owner 2012-04-01 17:58 2935087708 Active Malibu Land next to (3) Million Dollar Homes! "BEST OFFER" - lax real estate - by owner 2012-04-01 17:52 2935078101 Active Free Training then work from Home Hard Working Sales People only! - bak real estate jobs 2012-04-01 17:39 2935058725 Active Top 1% SEO Expert Worldwide for Ad online Business increase! CLICK NOW - orc write/edit/trans 2012-04-01 17:26 2935039554 Deleted Palm Springs Getaway "BEST OFFERS" - sdo general for sale - by owner 2012-03-24 18:27, renewed 2012-04-01 17:23 2920740787 Active April,May,June Timeshare Rentals/Oceanfront/View *********BEST OFFERS! - $59 phi vacation rentals 2012-03-05 20:27, renewed 2012-04-01 17:22 2886956983 Active Developed apps for PPC/Profit Website income ***Page 1 of 256 MILLION! - $66995 sdo computers - by dealer 2012-04-01 17:16 2935023869 Active Villas of Sedona Timeshare "BEST OFFERS" - $55 flg vacation rentals 2012-03-05 20:08, renewed 2012-04-01 17:13 2886936480 Active April 21-28 Charlotte Bay Resort w/FREE GOLF by Lift Putter LLC Assets - $199 fmy vacation rentals 2012-03-05 19:10, renewed 2012-04-01 17:13 2886867784 Active Lift Putter Golf Events for Charity/Promote Products 3/12-12/9/2012 - mia events 2012-03-05 19:23, renewed 2012-04-01 17:12 2886883991 Deleted Lift Putter LLC offers 5.9 Million Presidential Reserve Platium Points - $2295 nyc sublets & temporary 2012-03-24 18:12, renewed 2012-03-29 18:01 2920722917 Active Lift Putter Golf Company Needs Metal/Hard Rubber foundry workers - lvg manufacturing jobs 2012-02-24 22:10, renewed 2012-03-24 18:03 2869704498 Active Lift Putters Company, Franchise offered Locally - $49250 stl business/commercial - by owner 2012-02-24 22:05, renewed 2012-03-24 18:01 2869701740 Active Rent or Sell Wyndham Resort Timeshare Oceanfront by Lift Putter! CLICK - $129 prv vacation rentals 2012-02-24 22:06, renewed 2012-03-24 18:00 2869702482 Active Help with website Links/Pics/Security for Lift Putter Future Projects! - lax computer gigs 2012-02-24 22:08, renewed 2012-03-24 18:00 2869703229 Active Club Aphrodite at Erimi Gardens 25m/Paphos by Lift Putter Worldwide! - $239 par vacation rentals 2012-02-24 22:12, renewed 2012-03-24 18:00 2869706035 Active Huge Golf Lot of Putters Patent Lift "INSERT Clubhead "Balls Out! - $595 nhm business/commercial - by owner 2012-02-24 22:19, renewed 2012-03-24 18:00 2869710036 Active Mittersill Condo unit 236 PRE-FORECLOSURE ***********Short Pay to HOA! - $1599 nhm real estate - by broker 2012-02-24 22:15, renewed 2012-03-24 17:59 2869707748 page: 1 2 3 Click the posting title to go to the 'manage' page for that posting. We are not able to offer a removal option at this time. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 2012 craigslist, inc.
Leave a comment
|
|
| |
Bonner said... April 09, 2012 @ 3:54:30 AM EST
|
|
| |
Matt Drudge must be getting serious payment from Mittens. I just dropped by his site at 3:20am and he has four more negative attacks added to the site in addition to the ones highlighted in this post. For a total of 10 simultaneous stories highlighted. How many of them negative? Yeah, of course. ALL TEN.Drudge is beginning to draw similarities to Think Progress, or Slate. It’s totally wrong when the left does it, and the same applies when the right does it. Bias with the specific intent to manipulate opinion is a horrid agenda. This type of bias is not advocacy. Advocacy would be highlighting the positives of your candidate. This is SMEAR.
auto insurance auto insurance quotes |
|
| |
Cherlin said... April 10, 2012 @ 2:24:30 AM EST
|
|
| |
Awesome work, SD. I take particular offense at Drudge’s distortions of the Reagan days. When Newt criticized the “Reagan Administration,” he was not just criticizing Reagan, or even chiefly Reagan, but mainly the White House leadership that caused so many of the failures during that time. That includes GHW Bush, who (big surprise) is a big fat Romney supporter now. That’s friggin’ dishonest of Drudge. Remember “Let Reagan be Reagan?” That’s because there were plenty of forces in that WH pulling Reagan off his center.
car insurance quotes auto insurance quotes |
|
| |
Romney got it finally said... April 10, 2012 @ 10:50:29 PM EST
|
|
| |
Mitt all the way now said...
April 10, 2012 @ 10:43:38 PM EST
2 hours ago Santorum adviser insists he will rally behind Romney Posted by CNN's Ashley Killough (CNN) – John Brabender, an adviser to Rick Santorum, gave more details Tuesday night about the hours leading up to Santorum’s announcement to suspend his presidential campaign. In an interview on CNN’s “John King, USA,” Brabender said he called Mitt Romney’s campaign manager, Matt Rhoades, Monday night to relay the news that Santorum would leave the race the following day. – Follow the Ticker on Twitter: @PoliticalTicker “We had a great conversation. We expressed that the senator would be getting out and that we do want to help the Romney campaign,” Brabender told CNN Chief National Correspondent John King. “It was suggested that we have the two candidates talk to each other, which they did this morning.” He added that Romney recommended to Santorum the two meet soon to talk about “ways in which Rick Santorum could help.” Responding to questions about Santorum not mentioning Romney in his exit speech, Brabender cautioned people against reading too much into it. “Rick felt that it was very important to have a narrative that shares why he was suspending his campaign and all the good that the campaign did, and also make it clear that Rick Santorum is going to be a passionate fighter and a loud voice for conservative causes,” Brabender said. While the rival candidates often engaged in scathing attacks as they battled for delegates, Brabender maintained Santorum would ultimately rally behind Romney in the general election. “Rick has been very clear from Day One that he would unify behind whoever the candidate is, the Republican nominee, because they certainly are a much stronger and better hope for America than Barack Obama,” Brabender said. “And he will do that right now with Mitt Romney.” Also see: Poll: Nearly three-quarters of Republicans see Romney as nominee Romney: I speak with Gingrich more than Santorum Romney campaign pulls negative ad while Santorum halts campaigning Filed under: 2012 • Rick Santorum We recommend Romney takes big lead in new poll CNN Political Ticker Bristol Palin to Obama: Call me CNN Political Ticker Remembering 'disgusting, rebellious' era of trading cards: 'Garbage Pail Kids' CNN Living Santorum: Louisiana vote shows the race goes on CNN Politics Caregiving for loved ones the 'new normal' for boomers CNN Living Will Facebook ruin Instagram? CNN Tech From around the web Do you support Obama’s re-election? Newsmax.com Larry Flynt: The Right to Be Left Alone SnagFilms 8 Memory Problems that Could be Signs of Alzheimer's Caring.com How birth order can affect your finances BankRate.com Is Lean Startup the New Bubble? (Spoiler: Probably Not!) CNBC Power Shift Barron's
|
|
| |
gop unites for saving america said... April 11, 2012 @ 1:01:19 AM EST
|
|
| |
Rick Santorum's departure from presidential race leaves future doors open
He not only clears the way for front-runner Mitt Romney and ends a damaging battle for the GOP — he also leaves in a better position for a possible run in the future.
Comments 5Share68
1 2 next | single page
Rick Santorum, with family members at a news conference in Gettysburg, Pa., announces he is suspending his bid for president. (Jeff Swensen, Getty Images / April 10, 2012)
Also
Obama campaign uses Santorum exit to attack Romney
Santorum says he was the only true social conservative in the race
Rick Santorum falling behind in Pennsylvania
Ads by Google
By Seema Mehta, Los Angeles Times
April 10, 2012, 8:53 p.m.
GETTYSBURG, Pa. — Rick Santorum's decision to leave the Republican presidential race boosted two candidacies: Mitt Romney was spared two more weeks of struggle before he could be crowned the presumptive nominee even as Santorum set the stage for a future run for office.
Santorum's announcement Tuesday that he would suspend his campaign effectively ended a bruising intraparty clash that many feared was harming Republicans' ability to take on President Obama in the fall. Though Romney remains a distance from the 1,144 delegates needed to claim the nomination, he can now turn his full attention to combating his general election opponent.
Santorum emerged from the contest far stronger than he entered it, having transformed himself from a political has-been to a leader of the party's evangelical and non-establishment wings. The youngest candidate in the field at 53, he left as the second-place finisher, a position from which he could mount a serious effort in 2016 or 2020.
In a poignant closing speech, Santorum acknowledged the unlikelihood of his insurgent campaign winning.
"This race was as improbable as any race that you will ever see for president. I want to thank God for that and I want to thank all of you," said Santorum, surrounded by his wife, Karen, and four of their seven children at the Gettysburg Hotel. "Thank all of you across this country for what you have given ... which is a voice to those who are, in many cases, voiceless. And we have tried to be a witness not just for your stories and your voice, but to provide a positive and hopeful vision, not a negative campaign."
He would, Santorum said, "continue to fight for those voices."
Santorum alluded to months spent campaigning, either anonymously, nearly broke and almost alone or — later — with a semblance of an entourage as his candidacy gained strength.
"It was a love affair for me going from state to state and seeing the differences, but seeing the wonderful, wonderful people of this country who care deeply about where this country is going in the future, who care deeply about those who are out there paddling alone, who are feeling left behind, and in some respects feeling hopeless and want to do something," he added.
The former Pennsylvania senator, who has bitterly criticized Romney as too similar to Obama on issues such as healthcare, gun control and climate change, did not mention Romney during his remarks. Aides said later that he spoke to the front-runner on the phone shortly before he announced his decision and that they would meet in person soon, at Romney's request.
Although Rep. Ron Paul and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich remain candidates, Santorum was the only realistic obstacle to Romney claiming the nomination. His absence means that Romney will not have to face a contested April 24 primary in Pennsylvania, a battleground state in the fall and one which Santorum represented in Congress.
That will spare him discussion of some of the controversial social issues that Santorum brought to the forefront of the Republican race and that have turned off independents and moderates who are key to a November victory.
"This is just a great news day for the Romney campaign," said Steve Duprey, a nonaligned New Hampshire campaign veteran. "Now he doesn't have to worry about defending his flank."
Romney seconded the sentiment at a campaign event in Wilmington, Del.
"This has been a good day for me," Romney said to applause from a subdued crowd. "Sen. Santorum has decided not to proceed with his campaign, and I had the chance to speak with him this morning. We exchanged our thoughts about going forward, and we both have a great deal of interest in seeing the country taken on a very different path. He has made an important contribution to the political process."
In the beginning, that did not seem possible for Santorum, who lost his Senate reelection campaign in 2006 by 17 percentage points.
Largely ignored as he drove past the cornfields of Iowa in a pickup, Santorum doggedly met with voters at diners, farms and county fairs. Sometimes only one voter would show up, but he kept plugging away, holding nearly 400 events across the state's 99 counties.
That work paid off in a surprise win in Iowa and in 10 other states as he became the physical manifestation of the GOP base's unhappiness with Romney. But in states where he could have blunted Romney's march, he fell to a barrage of negative ads from the flush Romney operation. Santorum's ill-funded team had neither the resources nor the organization for important basics like filling slates of delegates, meaning that even in states he won he could not fully shake Romney.
Santorum's decision came as key GOP figures had begun to coalesce behind the former Massachusetts governor, arguing that it was time for the party to focus on beating Obama.
Speaking to reporters and declining to take questions, Santorum did not directly address why he was leaving the race, but said the decision had been made around the kitchen table, where the family had also decided to enter the contest.
Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times
|
|
| |
Precious said... April 11, 2012 @ 10:03:21 PM EST
|
|
| |
Pointing out the negatives is acceptable if it’s done honestly and reasonably. Drudge is relying on distortion almost 100% of the time here. Just like Stink Progress and the leftist sites. Dishonest. Wrong. Evil. One of those pesky ten commandments has something to do with bearing false hipness? Or something? Personally I think it’s one of the more serious of all the ten. You don’t lie about people. Even when you disagree with them.
buy auto insurance online auto insurance quotes |
|
| |
Press Release: Texted mobile political donation rulings said... April 15, 2012 @ 6:56:43 PM EST
|
|
| |
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Blog
Resources
About new rulings/asking for new laws
Democrat, Republican political collectors ask FEC to OK texted contributions
By Stanley(Stan)Krol Entrepreneur CEO/Texted.mobi created this idea, March 11,2009, unlike super PACS, which under federal law are not supposed to coordinate with canididates.
Apr 11 2012 5:32 a.m.
The Next idea Mr. Krol has is to try this method with "Bundling" donations. Bundlers are typically well-connected business and banking("Banksters")executives who tap their professional and social media networks for HIGH ROLLER Contributions from wealthy supporters and lobbyists groups per federal laws.
The economy may be largely lackluster but the political sector is so flush with cash it appears on the verge of creating a whole new profession: Campaign contribution brokers.
That would be the result if the Federal Election Commission approves a bipartisan request that it made public late Wednesday afternoon. Filing on behalf of two campaign consulting groups, one Democrat and one Republican, the blue-chip Washington law firm Arendt Fox urges the FEC to approve a system for texting small contributions to political campaigns that would allow middlemen to collect as much as 50 cents on every donated dollar.
The brokers are part of an ingenious and complex financial mechanism designed to overcome objections the FEC raised two years ago, when it shot down an effort to win approval of texted contributions, hotly sought after by political campaigns at the time because of the large sums raised for south Asian tsunami relief through cell phone donations. One of the issues the FEC raised was the amount of time it would take for campaigns to get the money: the commission requires the funds be transfered within 10 days, a deadline that might not be met if the campaigns had to wait for a donor's cell phone bill to be paid.
Brokers would solve the problem, the political consultants say, by "buying" the pledge from the campaign and providing cash immediately, then collecting the money from the donors. But because of the uncertainty about whether donors would make good on their offers, there would be a premium: The middlemen would take anywhere from a 30 percent to 50 percent cut under the plan outlined in the filing to the FEC.
One company that is ready to provide such a service, m-Qube, joined the request to the FEC. Brett Kappel, one of the lawyers who wrote the brief, says m-Qube already serves as a phone donation "aggregator" for charities. The other two firms requesting approval of texted contributions are ArmourMedia, which lists the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee among its clients, and Red Blue T LLC, described in the letter to the FEC as "a political consulting firm whose principals have advised Republican presidential and congressional campaigns."
Individuals would be limited to giving $50 or less a month to any one political committee via text. Kappel predicted that most donations would come in amounts of $10. Supporters of the proposal argue its a way to bring the political money game into the digital arena and to engage young people. "Younger people like my children live on their phones," Kappel said. He added that President Obama's campaign, with its large database of small donors, could be a big beneficiary of a favorable decision by the FEC. "I should think they would want this request to go through," he said.
The FEC has 60 days to issue a draft ruling on the request.
More Sharing Services Social Media Share| twitter facebook/texted stan krol lift putters/contact forward this FAQ 1-424-781-5435 24hrs... |
|
| |
Press Release: Texted mobile political donation rulings said... April 15, 2012 @ 7:00:59 PM EST
|
|
| |
Sunday, April 15, 2012
Blog
Resources
About new rulings/asking for new laws
Democrat, Republican political collectors ask FEC to OK texted contributions
By Stanley(Stan)Krol Entrepreneur CEO/Texted.mobi created this idea, March 11,2009, unlike super PACS, which under federal law are not supposed to coordinate with canididates.
Apr 11 2012 5:32 a.m.
The Next idea Mr. Krol has is to try this method with "Bundling" donations. Bundlers are typically well-connected business and banking("Banksters")executives who tap their professional and social media networks for HIGH ROLLER Contributions from wealthy supporters and lobbyists groups per federal laws.
The economy may be largely lackluster but the political sector is so flush with cash it appears on the verge of creating a whole new profession: Campaign contribution brokers.
That would be the result if the Federal Election Commission approves a bipartisan request that it made public late Wednesday afternoon. Filing on behalf of two campaign consulting groups, one Democrat and one Republican, the blue-chip Washington law firm Arendt Fox urges the FEC to approve a system for texting small contributions to political campaigns that would allow middlemen to collect as much as 50 cents on every donated dollar.
The brokers are part of an ingenious and complex financial mechanism designed to overcome objections the FEC raised two years ago, when it shot down an effort to win approval of texted contributions, hotly sought after by political campaigns at the time because of the large sums raised for south Asian tsunami relief through cell phone donations. One of the issues the FEC raised was the amount of time it would take for campaigns to get the money: the commission requires the funds be transfered within 10 days, a deadline that might not be met if the campaigns had to wait for a donor's cell phone bill to be paid.
Brokers would solve the problem, the political consultants say, by "buying" the pledge from the campaign and providing cash immediately, then collecting the money from the donors. But because of the uncertainty about whether donors would make good on their offers, there would be a premium: The middlemen would take anywhere from a 30 percent to 50 percent cut under the plan outlined in the filing to the FEC.
One company that is ready to provide such a service, m-Qube, joined the request to the FEC. Brett Kappel, one of the lawyers who wrote the brief, says m-Qube already serves as a phone donation "aggregator" for charities. The other two firms requesting approval of texted contributions are ArmourMedia, which lists the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee among its clients, and Red Blue T LLC, described in the letter to the FEC as "a political consulting firm whose principals have advised Republican presidential and congressional campaigns."
Individuals would be limited to giving $50 or less a month to any one political committee via text. Kappel predicted that most donations would come in amounts of $10. Supporters of the proposal argue its a way to bring the political money game into the digital arena and to engage young people. "Younger people like my children live on their phones," Kappel said. He added that President Obama's campaign, with its large database of small donors, could be a big beneficiary of a favorable decision by the FEC. "I should think they would want this request to go through," he said.
The FEC has 60 days to issue a draft ruling on the request.
More Sharing Services Social Media Share| twitter facebook/texted stan krol lift putters/contact forward this FAQ 1-424-781-5435 24hrs... |
|
| |
Copy from email said... April 22, 2012 @ 4:03:44 PM EST
|
|
| |
Stan,
I had a pretty big week leading up to my birthday this past Monday. I've been overwhelmed by the huge outpouring of support I received from across the country. Thank you for your kind words. It was the best birthday gift I could have asked for.
Mitt never misses an opportunity to thank his supporters, especially if it means he can chat with them over a burger or a stack of pancakes. So now it's my chance to do the same.
Ann Romney |
|
| |
Mitt vs Barack said... April 24, 2012 @ 5:17:13 PM EST
|
|
| |
It's an election year and the big question on everyone's mind: Will President Barack Obama or former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney take the White House next year and what does it mean for the U.S. economy?
Recent national polls show Obama with a slight lead over Romney in the general election. Obama held 46% of the vote compared to Romney's 42%, in the most recent Quinnipiac University national survey.
At the same time, Obama's job approval rating is back at 50 percent with 44 percent of people disapproving of his job performance, according to Gallup. This uptick in Obama's approval rating is in line with a marginally improved economy. U.S. gasoline prices are down to four-week lows and unemployment hit 8.2 percent in March.
Felix Salmon, financial blogger at Reuters, says another Obama win is likely, but it would not be good for the U.S. economy.
"I do believe that, at least in the short term, Mitt Romney would be better," Salmon tells The Daily Ticker's Henry Blodget in the accompanying interview. Should Obama win, "we are going to create four more years of this absolute dysfunctional nightmare in Congress where no one can agree on anything."
In Salmon's view, Republicans are adamantly opposed to Obama's policies, regardless of the issue. One prime example is the Affordable Care Act, which began as a conservative idea.
"[Obama] is not making mistakes, he is doing it right," Salmon says about the president's handling of the economy. "The more successful he is the more that the Republicans reflexively just want to oppose everything that he does for no other reason than that he is doing it."
Salmon believes gridlock in Washington would end if Romney became president, which is why he thinks Romney would be good for America.
Is Obama or Romney better for the U.S. economy? Tell us what you think in the comments below or on Facebook!
...
Related Quotes:
^IXIC2,961.60-8.85-0.30%^DJI13,001.56+74.39+0.58%^GSPC1,371.97+5.03+0.37% .
Sponsored by:
Yahoo! Poll.
Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?
.
Yes
No
..
.
. .
.
Pagination.
.
Previous
Netflix Tanks Again As Wall Street Freaks Out About Growth Forecast
The American Dream Of Buying A Home May Be Over: Karl Case
Next
.. .
All Comments
.
.
Top LocationsSan Francisco Ventura Chicago Cincinnati Everett St Petersburg New York Los Angeles Miami Las Vegas
Leave a comment...Comment Guidelines
Please Enter a Comment
Post As
729 comments
Popular Now
Newest
Oldest
Most Replied
11Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!0
Fred Mertz • McKinney, Texas • 2 hours 52 minutes ago
Unfortunately the idea of "meeting in the middle" doesn't make sense. It's like one party says "going to Phoenix is the answer" and the other says "no, going to Baltimore is the thing to do". How do you compromise a destination?
3 Replies .
4Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!0
Creeper • New York, New York • 20 minutes ago
In most cases gridlock in Washington is a good thing. The more laws they pass the less free we are. Our laws are so complicated now after many sessions of congress and nearly 50 presidents that I doubt anyone in this country understands even half of the laws. The tax code is a great example. We... More
Reply .
2Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!0
gsdfhdgjhfdhjjjjjkgkjgjks ... • Chicago, Illinois • 13 minutes ago
Are you all saying it was much better in 2008?
Reply .
2Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!0
Deeromatic • Portland, Oregon • 51 minutes ago
Felix salmon is paided to write this souless article , what else did he know better than Paul
Reply .
11Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
jeffrey h • Atlanta, Georgia • 1 hour 58 minutes ago
extortion is not a good reason to elect someone
1 Reply .
5Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
KennethB • 1 hour 1 minute ago
If Obama would have cut the deficit in half, closed gitmo and/or kept unemployment under 8% as he promised, he may have been worthy of a second term.
4 Replies .
8Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
KennethB • 1 hour 15 minutes ago
Evidently, the author is not familiar with the 2010 "summer of recovery" Obama promised!
Reply .
8Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
David • 1 hour 46 minutes ago
Out sourcing jobs too China is not a good way to rebuild the U.S. economy.
Reply .
6Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
KennethB • 36 minutes ago
Obama did such a great job closing Gitmo, keeping unemployment under 8% and best of all cutting the deficit in half; he deserves another term keeping these promises!!!!
Reply .
5Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
KennethB • 1 hour 2 minutes ago
Are you kidding I am just sitting here enjoying that "summer of recovery" Obama promised in 2010.
1 Reply .
7Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
People Power II • Pontiac, Michigan • 4 hours ago
Felix!
See ya in Novermber!!! lol
(There's something "fishy" about this guy)
Reply .
22Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!3
Charles R • 4 hours ago
These surveys dont mean anything because they are taken by people who care about politics and who actually have an opinion and follow what they believe in, unfortunately the votes that swing the balance are held by people who dont care about whats going on. They will see a man who has a nice voice... More
2 Replies .
16Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!2
A G • Hong Kong, Hong Kong-China • 2 hours 52 minutes ago
Salmon is an idiot. Regardless of which party wins the Executive seat we're going to continue to have this Stalemate Congress to contend with so long as the Senate and House are bipolar. Does the Daily Ticker really think that low of the American people that they'd publish this crap?!?
1 Reply .
14Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!2
None of ya Business • 4 hours ago
Neither one of these flunkies are good for the economy. Besides you need to also look at Congress, The House & The Senate. Until this country gets off of its hardcore political lines, quits grandstanding, etc we are doomed.
Reply .
12Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!2
Daniel • 4 hours ago
You like to blame the Democratic Senate and House during Bush's last two years
But Bush never vetoed a thing they introduced
1 Reply .
4Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
Marvin Gardens • 26 minutes ago
That's right...vote the guy in so his right wing conservative party can run the ship of state into the Wall St. Bankster's reef...if the Congress is like that, it is the DUTY of Americn voters to kick the m OUT, and vote in someone who represents the PEOPLE, and NOT self serving political traitors!
Reply .
3Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!1
Ready Now • 36 minutes ago
A toothless hound would be better than Lord Superfly, Reid and Pelosie. I want to see their plans to fix SS and Medicare. They have none yet still tell us they can't go on as they are structured now. All they can do is try to scare elders and the poor to drum up anti-conservative votes.
Reply .
19Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!3
46thPres • Collinsville, Illinois • 3 hours ago
How funny that for weeks we had to read about how Obama had no control oo rising gas prices but not gas prices are at "4 week lows" its because of Obama and his policies.
Does the media ever read and remember the things they printed just a month ago.
2 Replies .
11Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!2
Viki • 3 hours ago
Ok, so if I get it right Romney would be good because he has a republican congress so he can get bills passed. What kind of insane logic is this. What if the congress becomes democratic. Then is Romney bad. What about the Senate ?
2 Replies .
12Please sign in to rate!Please sign in to rate!2
John • Las Vegas, Nevada • 4 hours ago
everyone in congress should be held too 4 years terms and no more this way they dont have enough time steal from us they all are no good only for thenselfs
1 Reply .
.
More
Post a comment .
.
.
Editors' Picks.
.
Apple Pays Dividend: Tim Cook Is Definitely a Different Leader Than Steve Jobs, Analyst Says
PIMCO's Bill Gross: QE3, Inflation, Muted Growth on the Way
Speculation in the Oil Markets Must Stop: Senator Bernie Sanders
..
.
AdChoices
..
.
FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER.
.
The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.
.
@YahooFinance
...
.
Yahoo! Finance
YahooFinance
Yahoo! Finance
..
Breaking: Apple rockets past earnings expectations. Shares soar after hours $AAPL
.
19 mins ago
Reply Retweet Favorite
New case of mad cow disease in California http://t.co/rfnxX9qO
.
53 mins ago
Reply Retweet Favorite
Apple infringes on Motorola Mobility patent http://t.co/6MP6Dlpd $MMI $AAPL
.
1 hr ago
Reply Retweet Favorite
How to beat government bonds using Social Security http://t.co/NANQKje3
.
1 hr ago
Reply Retweet Favorite
|
|
| |
Results growing on bing PPC stats said... May 05, 2012 @ 12:57:02 PM EST
|
|
| |
11,900,000 results
Ad
Download Apps: App Store
www.apple.com/apps
There's an app for almost anything. Find cool apps in the App Store.
Mitt Romney FAQ FYI facts
www.mittromneyapps.com/blog.cfm
Mitt Romney FAQ FYI facts January 07, 2012 @ 4:51:01 PM EST : Crime and punishment. Romney supports sentencing under the three strikes law. [27] [28] [29] Romney ...
MITT ROMNEY APPS
www.mittromneyapps.com
Website discussing current events regarding mitt romneyincluding free mitt appsand mitt romney app.
Mitt Romney's favorite iPad apps include Scrabble, Yelp, Drudge …
www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/politics/mitt-romneys-favorite-ipad-apps...
More details on myfoxdc.com ... Mitt Romney's favorite iPad apps include Scrabble, Yelp, Drudge Report. Updated: Monday, 23 Apr 2012, 8:57 PM EDT ...
App Store - Mitt Romney - Apple - iTunes - Everything you need to ...
itunes.apple.com/us/app/mitt-romney/id435667431?mt=8
Jan 25, 2012 · Read reviews, get customer ratings, see screenshots, and learn more about Mitt Romney on the App Store. Download Mitt Romney and enjoy it on your …
MITT ROMNEY APPS - mitt romney family
www.mittapps.com/mitt-romney-family/?topic=mitt%20romney%20family
Website discussing current events regarding mitt romney family topics include mitt smartphone appand Mitt Romney Apps.
The Mitt Romney App | ALOT Apps
www.alot.com/app/mitt-romney
ALOT is a place to find apps for your PC. Use ALOT apps to play games, get directions, check the weather, listen to the radio and much much more
App Store - Mitt Romney | Top Conservative 2012
itunes.apple.com/us/app/mitt-romney-top-conservative/id408234304?mt=8
Oct 08, 2011 · Read reviews, get customer ratings, see screenshots, and learn more about Mitt Romney | Top Conservative 2012 on the App Store. Download Mitt Romney …
Mitt Romney’s Bigotry Needs No Spokesman - Bloomberg
www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-03/mitt-romney-s...1 day ago
May 03, 2012 · Mitt Romney didn’t exactly fire Ric Grenell, who is gay, as his foreign policy ... Live TV; Channel Finder; Personalities; iPad App
Mitt Romney - Stand With Mitt | Facebook
www.facebook.com/mittromney?sk=app_159666897434174
Facebook is a social utility that connects people with friends and others who work, study and live around them. People use Facebook to keep up with friends, upload an ...
Mitt’s high-tech fingers - The Daily
www.thedaily.com/page/2012/04/23/042312-news-romney-ipads
Mitt’s high-tech fingers Romney’s favorite apps on ‘just amazing’ iPad include Scrabble and Yelp
.
Related Searches for mitt romney apps
Questions for Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney Live Feed
Lawyers in Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico Primary 2012
Mitt Romney's Legal Name
Gardening in Puerto Rico
Being Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico Texas
.
Ad
Download Apps: App Store
www.apple.com/apps
There's an app for almost anything. Find cool apps in the App Store.
Your results are personalized. Learn more
1
2
3
4
5
Next
Ads
Mitt Romney on Debt
EndingSpending.com/OnTheTrail
Romney Talks US Debt Crisis. Watch The On The Trail Video Today.
Paycheck Fairness Act
www.emilyslist.org/paycheckfairness
Is Mitt Romney for Equal Pay? Join Us and Demand an Answer Today!
Mitt Romney For President
www.CafePress.com/Mitt-Romney
Mitt Romney for President 2012. Show Support with T-Shirts & More!
cafepress.com is rated on Bizrate (29 reviews)
Mitt Romney Items
www.zazzle.com
Shop Our Best Designs or Create Your Own Mitt Romney Merchandise!
See your message here
Related Searches
Questions for Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney's Legal Name
Mitt Romney Live Feed
Gardening in Puerto Rico
Lawyers in Puerto Rico
Being Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico Primary 2012
Puerto Rico Texas
© 2012 Microsoft |
Privacy and Cookies |
Legal |
Advertise |
About our ads |
Help |
Feedback
|
|
| |
US Inflation 101 said... May 07, 2012 @ 2:39:50 PM EST
|
|
| |
FINANCIAL SURVIVAL 101
Most people are oblivious to what’s going on in America. They don’t "get it." You may not either. If so, I’m going to give it to you straight. It’s time for a wake-up call. It’s time for you to "get it." If you don’t "get it", your financial future is dim.
Last week I was talking with my 72-year old corporate counsel, who is planning to retire. I told him he couldn’t afford to retire. "You only have a million dollars," I said. "Subtract a $100,000 a year for inflation. In nine years you have the purchasing power of $100,000. You’ll be greeting people at Wal-Mart." I was only guessing about his net worth. Perhaps he’s got $2 million or more. I continued, "You’ve got guys managing your money who don’t "get it.". You’ve got these establishment guys with conventional investments in stocks and bonds, and they don’t see the big pictures. They could wipe you out." "I suppose," he mumbled.
My lawyer doesn’t "get it," doesn’t want to "get it." I understand that because almost nobody "gets it." It’s over for the America we’ve known. We’re on the down escalator. The assets we’ve relied on to keep us secure are now riskier than ever.
In the fall of 1999 I wrote a newsletter that warned about a pending crash in the stock market. The NASDAQ collapsed a month later. Subsequently, I wrote a newsletter about a coming crash in residential real estate. In 1999 I wrote a novel about gold rising to $1,000, people losing their homes, high inflation and a bad economy. It was right on the money. I’m not bragging, I’m making a point. How did I write such accurate forecasts? I learned the economics of sound money and free markets. There are incontrovertible truths in economics and when they are violated, the outcome is easy to predict. It’s no particular brilliance on my part, only common sense conclusions that any unbiased reader would arrive at.
Eighty years ago, in 1928, Babe Ruth, the greatest baseball player of all time, made $50,000 a year. Alex Rodriguez, a Yankee star of today, makes $28 million. The Babe made 1/5 of 1% of Rodriguez’s salary. That’s .002. In a way, you could say the money of 1928 has become virtually worthless.
Let’s go back 40 years – half way to 1928. In 1968 Willie Mays was voted the most valuable player in the All-Star game. He made $120,000 that year. Do you "get it"? $50,000 - $120,000 - $28,000,000. The rate of depreciation of the dollar is increasing exponentially (the bigger it gets, the faster it grows). Somewhere in America today (or in South America), a two year old kid tosses around a rubber ball. In less than 30 years he will earn one-billion dollars a year to play baseball.
In 1934 the politicians gained control of the money. The free market had determined that gold and silver were money. (Remember, the free market is the clearinghouse for the buying choices of the citizens. In the free market the consumer is king, not the government. The consumers decide who succeeds and who fails through their buying choices. The free market is the essential component of liberty.) I’m not stumping for a return to the gold standard. There isn’t enough silver available to be money on Wake Island and gold would have to be $40,000 to $50,000 an ounce. However, the one thing to remember about the gold standard is that politicians couldn’t create it out of thin air. That’s why it was good, and that’s why they got rid of it.
When government gained the monopoly on money, abolished the gold standard and allowed politicians to gain control over spending and money creation, the die was cast. It opened the door to ever-expanding social programs, wars and deficits. Before long, money and credit creation were used to stimulate the economy. Artificially low interest rates (not free market rates) spawned booms that invariably turned into recessions when the money growth slowed or interest rates rose. Today’s bubbles are created by excessive money and credit. We currently have bubbles in farmland, commercial real estate, art, antiques and collectors items. It’s the consequence of inflationary money and credit. In 1928, the national debt was $17 billion, in 1968 $347 billion, in 2008 $9 trillion. You see it’s running away.
Wall Street doesn’t "get it," the public doesn’t "get it," the politicians and bureaucrats most certainly don’t "get it" and, it seems that even the Federal Reserve doesn’t "get it." They just keep spending, borrowing and printing more money. Government liabilities may now exceed $60 trillion and the astronomical expenses from government social programs are going ballistic. Furthermore, the current crisis is calling for billions to finance bailouts and other guarantees. There’s no possibility of paying for all this without debasing the currency. Washington claims the inflation rate is under 4% and Wall Street, Main Street and the media buy it hook, line and sinker. Truly they don’t "get it."
The high inflation of today ruins the plans of retirees and throws many of them into poverty. Our inflation rate of 15% (my estimate) also acts as a hidden tax. It impacts the poor, low income workers and those on fixed incomes at exactly the same rate as the rich who can better afford it. This cruel tax, brought to us exclusively by the government, makes poorer those who can least afford it. No person, rich or poor, escapes this terrible depreciation of their money and the subtraction of their purchasing power.
That’s not all. Historically, inflation stokes hatred towards business persons and free enterprise. It elevates left-wing demagogues who promise redistribution. It encourages a bigger nanny state, more lobbying, political corruption and loud demonstrations by subsidized activist group. Ultimately, runaway inflation leads to enormous social unrest, civil disobedience, riots, strikes, radical politics and other destabilizing upheavals.
In the history of severe inflations (including the Weimar Republic and two fiat money episodes in 18th century France) only a few nimble investors and speculators survived and prospered. The vast majority of people lost their shirt. Most of them didn’t know or understand what was happening. They didn’t "get it." There was much speculation gambling, debt and leverage, but in the end, all was lost.
Figure it out for yourself. Stocks are down 20% and inflation is 15% (Shadowstats.com says inflation is 12%). That means many investors are out 1/3, and if inflation stays at this level, in twelve months they will be down 50%. Virtually everyone will argue with this viewpoint. That’s because they don’t "get it." Eventually they face ruin.
Savers and bondholders are also taking a shellacking. Back in 1980 there was an elderly currency analyst by the name of Franz Pick who spoke at monetary conferences. He was fond of saying, "Bonds are certificates of guaranteed confiscation." He may have been premature in 1980, but no longer. In 2000 I bought an old Superman comic book. This high-grade 1941 copy has more than doubled. So far in this century comic books have been better than government bonds.
The secret to financial survival now and in your retirement is to own tangible assets that will appreciate at a level that exceeds the rate of inflation. Convert depreciating paper assets into tangible assets. Make sure they are not in a bubble, and still promise appreciation. Don’t use leverage. Never try to make a killing. Be patient. Do not wind up on the financial scrap heap with the vast army of inflation-ravaged investors who didn’t "get it." Most investors are going to get killed. Be one of the select few who "gets it." Remember that in every big inflation those who listened to government spokesmen were ruined.
I don’t want to terrify you, but there is one more thing I see happening. It could happen soon or it could be a long way off. Pray it’s the latter. Foreigners who hold trillions of U.S. dollars are losing billions as the dollar sinks. The Asians could have losses approaching $2 trillion. Chinese exports to the U.S. amounted to only 2.1% of their rapidly growing economy last year. The world doesn’t need our business as they once did. The stronger the world economy outside of the U.S., the less they’re going to be willing to hold depreciating dollars. Plus, many countries would like to stick it to us.
If too many countries abandon the dollar as the world’s reserve currency, and if a few large Asian countries are unwilling to buy our bonds, our government would soon be insolvent. The dollar would be next to worthless and a paralyzing hyperinflationary depression would lay the U.S. low. Don’t think it’s impossible. We can’t live beyond our means for decades, bury ourselves in debt, and consume more than we produce without a day of reckoning. That sad day is coming, I promise you. Contact Stanley(Stan)Krol Investments for "NOW"
|
|
| |
Pharmc551 said... May 08, 2012 @ 10:20:09 AM EST
|
|
| |
Hello! bkdffeg interesting bkdffeg site! I'm really like it! Very, very bkdffeg good! |
|
| |
Obama Hawaii BBQ said... May 11, 2012 @ 3:30:42 PM EST
|
|
| |
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=415746385111888&set=a.102339626452567.4821.100000295901508&type=1&ref=nf |
|
|
|
| |
|
|